人工智能生成内容的可版权性问题研究——以“菲林”案为例

The Copyright Issue of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content--Take the“Film”Case as an Example

人工智能生成内容与著作权客体具有外观相似性,能否获得著作权保护就必须明确其实质能否作为著作权客体。从著作权法作品要件为切入点进行界定,争议主要集中于人工智能生成内容的独创性和智力成果属性上。本文通过研究认为,人工智能生成内容满足智力成果的外观要件,但其产生过程不符合智力活动这一实质要件,故不具备智力成果属性。因此,人工智能生成内容不符合独创性和智力成果两要件而不具有可版权性。

The content generated by artificial intelligence is similar in appearance to the object of copyright.Whether it can obtain copyright protection is determined by whether its essence can be regarded as the object of copyright.To define the work elements of copyright law as the starting point,the controversy mainly lies in the originality of artificial intelligence generated content and the attributes of intellectual achievements.Through research,it's believed that the content generated by artificial intelligence can meet the appearance requirements of intellectual achievements,but its production process failed to meet the essential requirements of an intellectual activity,thus,it does not possess the attributes of intellectual achievements.Therefore,the content generated by artificial intelligence failed to meet the two requirements of originality and intellectual achievement and can not be count as copyright.