冒用他人互联网电子积分行为的刑法定性——以“冒用他人航空里程积分的行为”为例

The Criminal Nature of the Behaviour of Fraudulently Using others’Internet Electronic Integrals:Take the Behavior of Fraudulently Using others Air Mileage Integrals as an Example

互联网电子积分本身的占有及所有应当隶属于网络服务提供商,在冒用电子积分行为发生的过程中,电子积分本身并非发生占有及所有的移转,发生变化的乃是互联网电子积分的使用权。电子积分的使用权作为财产性利益,可以成为财产犯罪的对象。通过对于涉电子积分行为进行合类型性分析,从而为该行为性质的界定提供方向。在行为性质的认定上,首先形成对个案的预判,并将个案事实与规范认定相结合,进行个别化的判新,不应当一概而论。此外,行为人冒用他人互联网电子积分时,由于手段行为具有显著的技术性,可能会触犯其他罪名,从而在个案认定中,应当严格遵循罪数原理,做到不重复评价、不遗漏评价。

The possession and ownership of the Internet electronic integrals itself should belong to the network service provider.During the process of the fraudulent use of electronic integrals,the possession and ownership of electronic integrals are not transferred,but the right to use the Internet electronic integrals has been changed.As a property interest,the right to use electronic integrals can be the object of property crimes.Through the mixed-type analysis of behaviours related to the electronic integrals,it provides a direction for defining the nature of the behaviour.In terms of the definition of its nature,initially,it is necessary to form a pre judgment on the case,combine facts of the case with the standard identification,and make a new individual judgment.Moreover,when the actor fraudulently uses others’Internet electronic integrals,other crimes may be committed due to certain obvious technical behaviours.Therefore,in terms of identifying individual cases,the theory of number of crimes should be strictly followed in order to avoid repeated and omissive evaluation.