期刊文献+

Evaluating the performance of CMIP6 Earth system models in simulating global vegetation structure and distribution 被引量:3

原文传递
导出
摘要 Evaluation of vegetation structure and distribution simulations in Earth system models(ESMs)is the basis for understanding historical reconstruction and future projection of changes in terrestrial ecosystems,carbon cycle,and climate based on these ESMs.Such assessments can also provide important information of models'merits and shortcomings or systematic biases,and so clues for model development.Vegetation structure and distribution in ESMs are primarily characterized by three variables:leaf area index(LAI),tree height,and fractional coverage of plant functional type(PFT).However,for the ongoing Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6(CMIP6),only temporal variabilities of global-averaged LAI time series were evaluated,others remain largely uninvestigated.This study systematically investigates the spatial and/or temporal variability of the three critical variables from 27 ESMs in CMIP6 using satellite observations.Our results show that all models and the multi-model ensemble mean(MME)can generally reproduce the observed LAI spatial pattern but all of them overestimate the global mean LAI mainly due to overestimation of LAI in non-forested vegetated areas.Most CMIP6 models fail to capture the temporal variability in the annual LAI because of large biases in both the simulated trend magnitude and temporal pattern of interannual variability.The average LAI seasonal cycles in different latitude zones are roughly reproduced by the models,but 1-2 months delays in the LAI peak appear in the Arctic-boreal zone.Additionally,CMIP6 models overall overestimate tree height,and largely overestimate the global grass area but underestimate tree and shrub areas,especially in the middle and high latitudes.It should be kept in mind that such biases may have further impacts on the simulations of the related carbon and land-atmosphere interaction variables(e.g.,ecosystem production,carbon storage,transpiration,and temperature)for global change research.Hence,bias-correction should be made to improve reliability of vegetation structure and distribution when future projections and historical reconstructions.They also underscore the urgent need in development and parameterization of dynamic vegetation within Earth system models,such as phenology,allocation,and morphology schemes.
出处 《Advances in Climate Change Research》 SCIE CSCD 2021年第4期584-595,共12页 气候变化研究进展(英文版)
基金 the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFA0604804,2017YFA0604302) National Natural Science Foundation of China(41630530,41875137) the National Key Scientific and Technological Infrastructure project Earth System Science Numerical Simulator Facility(EarthLab).
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献46

  • 1丁一汇,李巧萍,董文杰.植被变化对中国区域气候影响的数值模拟研究[J].气象学报,2005,63(5):613-621. 被引量:90
  • 2Aber, J. D., J. M. Melillo, K. J. Nadelhoffer, J. Pastor, and R. D. Boone. 1991. "Factors Controlling Nitrogen Cycling and Nitrogen Saturation in Northern Temperate Forest Ecosystems:' EcologicalApplications 1 (3): 303-315. doi: 10.2307/1941759.
  • 3Arora, V., and G. J. Boer. 2005. "A Parameterization of Leaf Phenology for the Terrestrial Ecosystem Component of Climate Models:' Global Change Biology 11: 39-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00890.x.
  • 4Chapin, F. S. 1980. "The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants:' Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 233-260.
  • 5Cox, P. 2001. Description of the TRIFFID Dynamic Global Vegetation Model Bracknell: Hadley Centre Tech. Note 24, Hadley Centre, 16 pp.
  • 6Dong, M., G. M. Jiang, F. Z. Kong, Y. F. Wang, and Z. B. Zhang. 1997. The Observation and Analysis Standards of the Chinese Ecosystem Research Network: The Investigations, Observation and Analysis about Terrestrial Biomes. Beijing: Standards Press of China (in Chinese).
  • 7Friedlingstein, P., G. Joel, C. B. Field, and I.Y. Fung. 1999. "Toward an Allocation Scheme for Global Terrestrial Carbon Models:' Global Change Biology 5: 755-770. doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 2486.1999.00269.x.
  • 8Krinner, G., N. Viovy, N. de Noblet-Ducoudr, J. Oge, J. Polcher, P. Friedlingstein, R Ciais, S. Sitch, and I. C. Prentice. 2005. "A Dynamic Global Vegetation Model for Studies of the Coupled Atmosphere-biosphere System." Global Biogeochemical Cycles 19: GB1015. doi: 10.1029/2003GB002199.
  • 9Kucharik, C.J.,J.A. Foley, C. Delire, V. A. Fisher, M.T. Coe,J. D. Lenters, C. Young-Moiling, et al. 2000. "Testing the Performance of a Dynamic Global Ecosystem Model: Water Balance, Carbon Balance, and Vegetation Structure:' Global Biogeochemical Cycles 14 (3): 795-825. doi: 10.1029/1999GB001138.
  • 10Levis, S., G. B. Bonan, M. Vertenstein, and K.W. Oleson. 2004. The Community Land Model's Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (CLM-DGVM): Technical Description and User's Guide. NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-459+IA. Boulder, CO: National Center for Atmospheric Research, 50 pp.

共引文献45

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部