期刊文献+

腹腔镜下经肛拖出式直肠癌前切除术对低位直肠癌的疗效及对患者肛肠功能和生活质量的影响 被引量:13

Efficacy of Laparoscopic Transanal Drag-out Proctocolectomy for Low Rectal Cancer and Its Effect on Patients'Anorectal Function and Quality of Life
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜下经肛拖出式直肠癌前切除手术对于低位直肠癌患者临床疗效、肛肠功能及生活质量的影响。方法选取153例行直肠癌手术治疗的患者,根据手术治疗方式的不同,分为研究组及对照组两组,其中研究组采用腹腔镜下经肛拖出式直肠癌前切除术治疗,对照组采用腹腔镜辅助直肠癌前切除术治疗,比较2组患者的临床疗效等差异。结果研究组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术后首次排气时间及术后并发症发生率均显著优于对照组(P<0.05),而在术中淋巴结清扫数量及出血量方面比较无差异(P>0.05);术前两组患者的血清胃泌素及胃动素水平比较均无差异(P>0.05),而术后3天研究组患者的血清胃泌素及胃动素水平均较对照组改善明显(P<0.05);术前两组患者的肛门功能相关指标比较均无差异(P>0.05),而术后3天研究组患者的肛门功能相关指标均较对照组改善明显(P<0.05);术前两组患者的生活质量相关指标比较均无差异(P>0.05),而术后半年研究组患者的生活质量相关指标均较对照组改善明显(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜下经肛拖出式直肠癌前切除术治疗低位直肠癌的疗效更为显著,同时对机体的肛肠功能影响较小,并能改善患者的生活质量,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To analyze the efficacy of laparoscopic transanal drag-out proctocolectomy for low rectal cancer and its effect on patients'anorectal function and quality of life.Methods 153 patients with rectal cancer were selected and divided into the study group and the control group according to different surgical treatment methods.The study group was treated by laparoscopic transanal drag-out proctocolectomy and the control group was treated by laparoscopic-assisted proctocolectomy,comparing the clinical efficacy and other differences between the 2 groups.Results The patients in the study group had significantly shorter operative time,hospital stay,first postoperative venting time and lower postoperative complication rate than the control group(P<0.05),while there was no difference in the number of intraoperative lymph node dissection and bleeding volume(P>0.05);There was no difference in the serum gastrin and motilin levels between the 2 groups before surgery(P>0.05),while the serum gastrin and motilin levels in the study group improved significantly compared with the control group 3 days after surgery(P<0.05).There was no difference in the indexes related to anal function between the 2 groups before surgery(P>0.05),while the indexes related to anal function in the study group improved significantly compared with the control group 3 days after surgery(P<0.05);There was no difference in the indexes related to quality of life between the 2 groups before surgery(P>0.05),while the indexes related to quality of life in the study group improved significantly compared with the control group 6 months after surgery(P<0.05).Conclusion The efficacy of laparoscopic transanal drag-out proctocolectomy for the treatment of low rectal cancer is more significant,and at the same time,it has less impact on the body's anorectal function and can improve the quality of life of patients,so it is worthy of clinical promotion.
作者 吴玲利 WU Lingli(No.988 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese PLA,Jiaozuo,454000)
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2021年第10期1686-1689,共4页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
基金 河南省科技攻关项目(编号:2018020898)。
关键词 直肠经肛门拖出切除术 腹腔镜下直肠低位前切除术 肛肠功能 生活质量 Rectal transanal drag-out resection Laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection Anorectal function Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献101

  • 1李会晨,付文政,张锡朋.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌[J].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2014,3(2):61-62. 被引量:7
  • 2刘宝华,程雪云.肛肠肌电图对直肠癌术后肛门功能评价[J].中国肛肠病杂志,1996,16(2):22-24. 被引量:15
  • 3Fujita S, Akasu T, Mizusawa J, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or stage III lower rectal cancer ( COG0212 ) : results from a muhicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial Lancet O ncol, 2012,13 ( 6 ) : 616 - 621.
  • 4Nelson H,Petrelli N, Carlin A, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Nail Cancer lnst,2001,93 ( 8 ) :583 - 596.
  • 5Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Onco1,2010,11 (7) : 637 - 645.
  • 6Van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12 year follow-up of the muhicentre, randomized controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol, 2011,12 ( 6 ) :575 - 582.
  • 7Morcos B, Baker B, A1 Masri M, et al. Lymph node yield in rectal cancer surgery: effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol,2010,36 (4) :345 - 349.
  • 8Fem6ndez-Esparraeh G, Ayuso-Colella JR, Sendino O, et al. EUS and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of rectal cancer: a prospective and comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc, 2011,74 (1) :347 -354.
  • 9Quarto G, Sivero L, Benassai G, et al. Early rectal cancer: local excision by Trattsanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM). Ann Ital ChiL,2013,84( 1 ) :437 -439.
  • 10Li S, Chi P, Lin H, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus open resection for middle and lower rectal cancer: an NTCLES study. Surg Endosc ,2011,25 (10) :3175 - 3182.

共引文献173

同被引文献170

引证文献13

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部