期刊文献+

基于人工智能的处方审核实践与药师干预结果分析 被引量:7

The practice of prescription pre-review and the analysis of pharmacists'intervention results based on the artificial intelligence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的展现药师在处方前置审核中通过对不合理处方进行干预从而达到减少不合理处方、促进患者安全用药的作用。方法运用处方前置审核系统运行的数据,回顾性分析2019年5月~2020年4月药师干预的处方情况。结果药师处方干预成功率由52.85%上升至90.04%;药师干预的不合理处方问题类型位列前三的分别是适应证(71.27%)、用法用量(13.10%)、相互作用(6.44%);各类型处方问题药师干预成功率由高到低排序前三位是医院管理、配伍禁忌、适应证;药师干预成功率欠佳的是相互作用及特殊人群用药。结论药师在处方前置审核中需关注审方的重、难点,持续增强综合技能,结合临床实际与医生进行良好的沟通。 Objective To highlight the role of pharmacists in reducing unreasonable prescriptions and promoting the safe use of drugs for patients by intervening unreasonable prescriptions in the prescription pre-review.Methods Retrospectively analyze the prescriptions data intervened by pharmacists from May 2019 to April 2020 with the help of the the operation data from the prescription pre-review system.Results The success rate of pharmacists’intervention had increased from 52.85%to 90.04%;The top three types of the unreasonable prescriptions intervened by pharmacists are as follows:inappropriate indications(71.27%),inappropriate usages and dosages(13.10%)and adverse drug interactions(6.44%).Meanwhile,hospital management,incompatibility,and indications are the top three factors with high intervention success rate by pharmacists.However,we have lower intervention success rate in the the adverse drug interactions and the medications of special populations.Conclusion Pharmacists not only have to pay attention to the key points,the difficulties of prescription pre-review and strengthen the comprehensive ability,but keep a good communication with physicians combining with clinical practice.
作者 谢灵波 何莹 XIE Ling-bo;HE Ying(Department of Pharmacy,The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University,Shenzhen 518107,China)
出处 《中国处方药》 2021年第10期52-54,共3页 Journal of China Prescription Drug
关键词 处方前置审核 审方重点难点 药师干预 干预成功率 不合理处方 Prescription pre-review Key points and difficulties of prescription review Prescriptions intervention by pharmacists The success rate of pharmacists’intervention Unreasonable prescriptions
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献110

共引文献366

同被引文献99

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部