期刊文献+

基于多模态超声评价前列腺癌的诊断价值 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨多模态超声评价前列腺癌的诊断价值。方法:选取2019年10月—2020年10月于华北理工大学附属医院住院欲行前列腺病灶切除术的患者121例,术前行剪切波弹性成像(SWE)和超声造影(CEUS)检查,术后根据病理结果分为良性组和恶性组。结果:前列腺恶性病灶的剪切波弹性成像SWE各参数较良性病灶高,前列腺恶性病灶的增强强度较良性病灶的高,时间-强度曲线下面积较良性病灶大,达峰时间较良性病灶的达峰时间低。SWE联合CEUS的诊断的灵敏度、特异度、准确度分别为87.9%、86.2%、87.1%;Hosmer检验得出预测模型与观测值拟合良好,差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=1.726,P=0.987>0.05);行Kappa检验一致性分析,Kappa值为0.732,一致性较好。结论:多模态超声诊断前列腺癌的灵敏度、特异度、准确度均较高,诊断价值更高。
出处 《影像研究与医学应用》 2021年第18期62-63,共2页 Journal of Imaging Research and Medical Applications
基金 2019年河北省医学科学研究课题计划(20191130).
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献48

  • 1Pinthus JH, Witkos M, Fleshner NE, et al. Prostate cancers scored as Gleason 6 on prostate biopsy are frequently Gleason 7 tumors at radical prostatectomy:implication on outcome. J Urol, 2006,176:979-984.
  • 2Jiang J, Chen Y, Zhu Y, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the detection and characterization of prostate cancer:correlation with microvessel density and Gleason score. Clin Radiol, 2011,66 : 732-737.
  • 3Gyftopoulos K, Vourda K, Sakellaropoulos G, et al. The angiogenic switch for vascular endothelial growth factor-A and cyclooxygenase-2 in prostate carcinoma: correlation with microvessel density, androgen receptor content and Gleason grade. Urol Int,2011,87:464-469.
  • 4Bostwick DG, Wheeler TM, Blute M, et al. Optimized microvessel density analysis improves prediction of cancer stage from prostate needle biopsies. Urology,1996,48:47-57.
  • 5Yang J, Wu HF, Qian LX, et al. Increased expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF-C and VEGF receptor-3 in prostate cancer tissue are associated with tumor progression. Asian J Androl, 2006,8 : 169-175.
  • 6Sedelaar JP, van Leenders G J, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, et al. Mierovessel density : correlation between contrast ultrasonography and histology of prostate cancer. Eur Urol, 2001,40 : 285-293.
  • 7Halpern EJ, Gomella LG, Forsberg F, et al. Contrast enhanced transrectal ultrasound for the detection of prostate cancer: a randomized, double-blind trial of dutasteride pretreatment. J Urol,2012,188 : 1739 1745.
  • 8Roy C, Buy X, Lang H, et al. Contrast enhanced color Doppler endorectal sonography of prostate: efficiency for detecting peripheral zone tumors and role for biopsy procedure. J Urol, 2003,170:69-72.
  • 9Xie SW, Li H L, Du J, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with contrast-tuned imaging technology for the detection of prostate cancer: comparison with conventional ultrasonography. BJU Int ,2012,109: 1620-1626.
  • 10MitterbergerM,Pinggera GM, Horninger W,et al. Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy to conventional systematic biopsy:impact on Gleason score. J Urol, 2007,178:464-468.

共引文献30

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部