期刊文献+

微创瓷贴面与树脂充填在前牙切角缺损修复中的临床对比研究 被引量:2

A comparative study on the clinical effects of minimal invasive porcelain laminate veneer and resin restoration for anterior teeth with incisal angle defect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较微创瓷贴面和树脂充填在前牙切角缺损修复中的临床效果。方法选取2016年12月—2019年12月重庆永川古氏口腔诊所收治的86例前牙切角缺损,但未伤及牙髓,需要进行前牙美学修复的患者作为研究对象,随机分为瓷贴面组和树脂组,每组43例,分别进行微创瓷贴面和树脂直接充填式修复。对修复后患者的满意度、修复体效果,修复前后患者心理状况进行评估。结果瓷贴面组的满意度为95.3%,高于树脂组的74.4%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);修复后6个月,瓷贴面组和树脂组的修复体脱落、边缘合适性、边缘染色差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);瓷贴面组和树脂组修复前和修复后6个月HAMA评分均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论微创瓷贴面对前牙缺角缺损较树脂充填有更好的患者满意度,两者均能达到较好的修复效果和减轻患者的心理焦虑程度。 Objective To compare the clinical effects of minimal invasive porcelain laminate veneer and resin restoration for anterior teeth with incisal angle defect.Methods From December 2016 to December 2019,86 Patients with incisal angle defect of anterior teeth in our clinic who did not damage the dental pulp were selected as research objects.They were divided into porcelain veneer group and resin group,43 cases in each group,and were received treating respectively.The satisfaction of the patients,the effect of the prosthesis after repair,and the psychological status of the patients before and after repair between the two groups?were evaluated.Results The satisfaction rate of porcelain veneer group was 95.3%,which was significantly higher than that of resin group(74.4%)(P<0.05).After 6 months of treatment,there were no significant differences in marginal adaptation,restoration retention,and marginal discoloration between the porcelain veneer group and the resin group(P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in HAMA scores between the porcelain veneer group and the resin group before and 6 months after treatment(P>0.05),but the mean value of HAMA scores decreased,and there was no statistically significant difference in the reduced scores between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Minimal invasive porcelain laminate veneer has better patient satisfaction than resin restoration in anterior teeth with incisal angle defect.Both of them can achieve better therapeutic effect and reduce patients'psychological anxiety,and are worthy of clinical promotion.
作者 古秋华 刘雪梅 Gu Qiuhua;Liu Xuemei(The Yongchuan Gu's Dental Clinic of Chongqing City,Chongqing 402160)
出处 《基层医学论坛》 2021年第29期4156-4158,F0003,共4页 The Medical Forum
关键词 前牙切角缺损 美容修复 微创瓷贴面 树脂充填 疗效对比 Incisal angle defect Aesthetic restoration Minimal invasive porcelain laminate veneer Resin restoration Effect comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献133

  • 1齐峰,谢伟丽,李艳琳,樊久铭.三种粘结剂对全瓷贴面粘结剪切强度的对比研究[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2010,11(1):37-39. 被引量:17
  • 2熊亚茸,柯杰.口腔修复患者的临床心理分析[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2004,2(3):166-167. 被引量:7
  • 3巢永烈,陈贵丰.薄型瓷贴面牙体预备术式的分型探讨[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1996,14(1):38-40. 被引量:40
  • 4Filho AM,Vieira LC,Araujo E,et al.Effect of different ceramic surface treatment on resin microtensile bond strength [J].J Prosthodont,2004,13(1):28-35.
  • 5Kumbuloglu O,User A,Toksavul S,et al.Intra-oral adhesive systems for ceramic repairs:a comparison[J].Acta Odontol Scand,2003,61(5):268-272.
  • 6Komine F,Tomic M,Gerds T,et al.Influence of different adhesive resin cements on the fracture strength of aluminum oxide ceramic posterior crowns [J].J Prosthet Dent,2004,92(4):359-364.
  • 7Burke FJ,Fleming GJ,Nathanson D,et al.Are adhesive technologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence [J].J Adhes Dent,2002,4(1):7-22.
  • 8Chaiyabutr Y,McGowan S,Phillips KM,et al.The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic [J].J Prosthet Dent,2008,100(3):194-202.
  • 9Calamia JR,Calamia CS.Porcelain laminate veneers:reasons for 25 years of success [J].Dent Clin North Am,2007,51(2):399-417.
  • 10Chang JC,Hart DA,Estey AW,et al.Tensile bond strengths of five luting agents to two CAD/CAM restoration materials and enamel [J].J Prosthet Dent,2003,90(1):15-23.

共引文献87

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部