期刊文献+

患者危急值全流程信息化管理效果评价 被引量:5

Evaluation on the Effect of Information-based Management of the Whole Process of Patient Critical Value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的全面落实患者安全目标,优化完善危急值管理流程。方法以危急值全流程信息化管理模式期间的数据及经验为依托,对照管理期间发生的变化,分析危急值管理对医院带来的影响。结果2018年第一季度危急值处置及时率为81.31%,2019年第四季度危急值处置及时率为97.80%,危急值处置及时率有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论医院借助先进的信息平台,从危急值各个环节进行质量监控,实现了全流程信息化管理,保障了医疗质量及患者安全。 Objective To optimize and perfect the critical value management process,fully implement the goal regarding patients'safety.Methods Based on the data and experience during the whole process of critical value information management,the influence on the hospital was analyzed comparing with the changes during the management period.Results The timeliness rate of critical value disposal was 81.31%in the first quarter of 2018,and 97.80%in the fourth quarter of 2019.The timeliness rate of critical value disposal was statistically significant(P<0.01).Conclusion With the help of advanced information platform,the hospital carries out quality control from every link of critical value,realizing the information-based management of the whole process,and guaranteeing the medical quality and patient safety.
作者 谢丽娜·伊力 何萍 黄思语 XIELINA·Yili;HE Ping;HUANG Siyu(The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,Xinjiang,China)
出处 《中国卫生信息管理杂志》 2021年第5期647-650,共4页 Chinese Journal of Health Informatics and Management
关键词 危急值 患者安全 信息化 全流程管理 critical value patient safety informatization whole process management
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献54

  • 1Chinese Hospital Association, Heping Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100013, PRC.CHA2007年患者安全目标暨主要措施[J].中国医院,2007,11(1):29-30. 被引量:56
  • 2Lundberg GD. When to panic over an abnormal value [ J ]. Meb Lab Observer, 1972, 4(1) : 47-54.
  • 3国家卫生和计划生育委员会.国家卫生计生委办公厅关于印发麻醉等6个专业质控指标(2015年版)的通知.国卫办医函[2015]252号.2015年4月3日颁布.
  • 4Tillman J, Barth JH. "A survey of laboratory'eritical (alert) limits' in the UK [ J]. Ann Clin Bioehem, 2003, 40 Pt 2: 181- 184.
  • 5Dighe AS, Jones JB, Parham S, et al. Survey of critical value reporting and reduction of false-positive critical value results [ J ]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2008, 132 ( 10 ) : 1666-1671.
  • 6Lundberg GD. When to panic over abnormal values[ R]. Med Lab Obs, 1972,4 ( 1 ) :47-54.
  • 7Piva E, Sciacovelli I,. Zaninotto M. et al. Evaluation of effectiveness of a computerized notification system for reporting critical values[ J ]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2009,131 ( 3 ) : 432441. DOI: 10. 1309/AJCPYS80BUCBXTUH.
  • 8Piva E, Seiaeovelli L, Laposata M, et al. Assessment of eritical values policies in Italian institutions: comparison with the US situation[ J ]. ClinChemLab Med. 2010,48 ( 4 ) : 461-468. DOI: 10. 1515/CCLM. 2010. 096.
  • 9Wagar EA, Friedberg RC, Souers R, et al. Critical values comparison : a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes survey of 163 clinical laboratories [ J ]. Arch Pathol Lab Med , 2007,131 (12):1769-1775. DO1:10.1043/1543-2165(2007)13111769: CVCACO]2.0. CO;2.
  • 10Howanitz PJ, Steindel SJ, Heard NV. Laboratory critical values policies and procedures: a college of American Pathologists Q- Probes Study in 623 institutions[ J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med ,2002, 126(6) :663-669. DOI:I0. 1043/0003-9985(2002) 126 <0663 : LCVPAP >2.0. CO;2.

共引文献133

同被引文献49

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部