期刊文献+

最后通牒博弈中提议者情绪预测偏差对公平决策的影响:公平感知的作用

The Influence of Proposers’Affective Forecasting Bias on Fairness Decision in Ultimatum Game:The Mediating Effect of Fairness Perception
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探讨提议者情绪预测偏差对公平决策的影响以及其中介机制,采用了两轮最后通牒博弈提议者实验任务,第一轮测量分配方案被接受和拒绝的情绪预测偏差,第二轮测量提议者的分配方案。研究结果表明:(1)提议者情绪预测偏差影响公平决策;(2)公平感知在提议者情绪预测偏差与公平决策间起部分中介作用。研究认为,提议者对积极结果的情绪预测偏差,会降低其公平感知,进而降低其分配方案公平性;提议者对消极结果的情绪预测偏差,会提高其公平感知,进而增加其分配方案公平性。 To examine the influence of proposers’affective forecasting bias on fairness decision and its mediating mechanism,a two-round ultimatum game proposer experiment task was used.The first round measured the affective forecasting bias both in the forecasting of positive and negative outcome,and the second round measured the allocation offers.The results showed that:(1)Proposers’affective forecasting bias influenced fairness decision directly;(2)Fairness perception has a partial mediating effect between proposers’affective forecasting bias and fairness decision.Conclusion:Proposers’affective forecasting bias about positive outcome decreased the fairness perception,which in turn decreased the fairness of allocation decision;Proposers’affective forecasting bias about negative outcome increased the fairness perception,which in turn increased the fairness of allocation decision.
作者 方平 刘蕾 姜媛 Fang Ping;Liu Lei;Jiang Yuan(College of Psychology,Capital Normal University,Beijing 100048;School of Labor and Human Resources,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872;College of Psychology,Beijing Sport University,Beijing 100084)
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期269-275,共7页 Psychological Exploration
基金 国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“情绪预测偏差与决策关系的发展特点及其机制研究”(BBA160046)。
关键词 情绪预测 情绪预测偏差 公平决策 最后通牒博弈 公平感知 affective forecasting affective forecasting bias fairness decision ultimatum game fairness perception
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献151

  • 1苏彦捷,穆岩.公平——精神道德观念还是互利合作机制?[J].心理学探新,2004,24(3):26-29. 被引量:10
  • 2穆岩,苏彦捷.10~12岁儿童的同伴接纳类型与社交策略[J].心理发展与教育,2005,21(2):24-29. 被引量:19
  • 3赵章留,寇彧.儿童四种典型亲社会行为发展的特点[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(1):117-121. 被引量:73
  • 4Ayton, P., Pott, A. & Elwakili, N. (2007). Affective forecasting: Why can' t people predict their emotions? Thinking and Reasoning, 13, 62-80.
  • 5Breiter, H. C. , Aharon, I. , Kahneman, D. et al. (2001). Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses, Neuron, 30, 619-639.
  • 6Delgado, M. R., Locke, H. M., & Stenger, V. A, et al. (2003). Dorsal striatum responses to reward and punishment: effects of valence and magnitude manipulations, Cognitive, affective behavioral rteuroscience, 3, 27 - 38.
  • 7Dunn, K. , Brackett, M. , James, C. , Schneiderman, E. & Salovey, P. (2007). On emotionally intelligent time travel: Individual Differences in affective forecasting ability, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 85 - 93.
  • 8Forgas, J. P. (1992). Affect in social judgments and decisions: A multiprocess model. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 227- 275). New York: Academic.
  • 9Forgas, J. P. (1993). On making sense of odd couples: Mood effects on the perception of mismatched relationships, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 59 - 71.
  • 10Kahneman, D. (1994). New challenges to the rationality assumption, Journal of lnsititutional and Theoretical Economics, 150, 18 -36.

共引文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部