期刊文献+

决策支持系统交互界面设计中的视觉显著性评估研究 被引量:3

Evaluation of Visual Saliency in User Interface Design of Decision-making Support System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的以从视觉设计层面更好地引导用户理解信息层级关系,提升决策效率为目标,构建适用于决策支持系统交互界面信息设计中的视觉显著性权重评价指标体系。方法首先,基于决策行为和视觉认知等理论对决策支持系统交互界面的视觉显著性客观影响维度进行分析并提出评估框架;其次,采用层次分析法和专家评价法对其进行权重赋值评估,建立决策支持系统交互界面视觉显著性的评价方法并应用于某军装备管理态势监控界面设计。结果推理得到了显著性指标评估计算公式,并通过对某军装备管理态势监控界面进行实际计算和主观评价验证,验证了提出的视觉显著性指数评估方法的有效性。结论决策支持系统交互界面信息设计中的视觉显著性评价指标和评价方法研究,为优化、提升决策支持系统交互界面设计提供了新的理论方法和设计思路。 The study builds a visual highlighting evaluation index system(VHEIS)for user interface design of the decision-making support system(DSS)to guide users in understanding the relationship between the information levels and improving decision-making efficiency.The study firstly proposed an evaluation framework through the analysis of the objective influence dimension of the visual saliency of the user interface of the DSS based on the theories of decision-making behavior and visual cognition.Secondly,the study used Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)and expert evaluation method to weight the dimensions,built the VHEIS and applied it to the user interface design of the military equipment management situation monitoring system.The calculation formula was obtained by deduction and the effectiveness of the VHEIS was verified by the subjective evaluation test.It provides a new theoretical method and design idea for the optimization of the user interface design of the DSS.
作者 杨默涵 杨建明 钱晓松 YANG Mo-han;YANG Jian-ming;QIAN Xiao-song(Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081,China)
机构地区 北京理工大学
出处 《包装工程》 CAS 北大核心 2021年第20期77-84,共8页 Packaging Engineering
基金 中国博士后科学基金项目(2020M680401)。
关键词 决策支持系统 交互界面设计 视觉显著性评估 层次分析法 专家评价法 decision-making support system user interface design visual highlighting evaluation index system analytic hierarchy process expert evaluation method
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献58

  • 1JaneFA18飞行手册[EB/OL].http://www.docin.com/p-32943364.htIIll.
  • 2LEE E, MACGREGOR J. Minimizing user search time in menu retrieval systems [ J ]. Human Factors, 1985,27 (2) : 157 - 162.
  • 3MEJDAL S, MCCAULEY M E, BERINGER D B, et al. Hu- man factors design guidelines for muhifunction displays[ EB/ OL]. http://www, stormingmedia, us/45/4539/A453993. html.
  • 4HO D, BURNS C M. Ecological interface design in aviation domains : work domain analysis of automated collision detec- tion and avoidance [ EB/OL]. http://citeseerx, ist. psu. edu/viewdoc/download? doi = 10. 1. 1. 129. 9007&rep = repl &type = pdf.
  • 5DOWSLAND K A, DOWSLAND W B. Packing problems [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1992,56 (1) :2 -14.
  • 6KIM W C, FOLEY J D. Providing high-level control and ex- pert assistance in the user interface presentation design [ C ]// Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1993:430 - 436.
  • 7KAMBAN D, MAZIAR A, HOSSEIN S F. FARAGAM algorithm in satellite layout[ C]//Proceedings of the Sixth Asia- Pacific Conference on Multilateral Cooperation in Space Technology and Applications, Beijing,2001:120 - 127.
  • 8COOPER A,REIMANN R.About Face#2.0:交互设计精髓[M].詹剑锋,张知非,等译.北京:电子工业出版社,2008.
  • 9赵仑.ERPs实验教程[M].东南大学出版社,2010:75-79.
  • 10Ben-Bassat T. Meyer J, Tractinsky N. Economic and subjective measures of the perceived value ot" aesthetics and usability [J]. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2006, 13(2): 210-234.

共引文献79

同被引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部