《文心雕龙》“文学评论”之批评陆机研究

Study on the Criticism of Lu Ji from the Perspective of Literary Criticism in The Literary Mind and the Carving Dragons

《文心雕龙》多次提到陆机,涉及陆机的才学、人品、创作倾向及作品(主要是《文赋》)等。汇集并详论《文心雕龙》批评陆机之得失,可以看出,刘勰能以历史的眼光、褒贬兼有地对陆机予以评论。虽然刘勰在对文学作品内容、创作规律的系统把握上全面超越了陆机,但结合“论文叙笔”中相关篇目对陆机的批评来看,时隔千余年,确有值得商榷之处,甚至不尽确当的地方,尤其是《序志》篇对《文赋》的批评有失偏颇,但就批评的全面性、系统性而言,代表了中古时期的最高水平。

The criticism of Lu Ji from the perspective of literary criticism in The Literary Mind and the Carving Dragons can be found,involving Lu Ji′s talent,personality,creative tendency and works(mainly Wen Fu),etc.This paper summarizes the above contents and discusses their gains and losses in detail.It is found that Liu Xie′s comments on Lu Ji are questionable,especially the criticism of Wen Fu in Xu Zhi,but it can represent the highest level of the criticism on Lu Ji in the middle ancient times in terms of its comprehensiveness and systematicness.