摘要
Aims:The current study is designed to assess the methodological quality of the meta-analyses of cognitive interventions among Alzheimer's disease,and to investigate the compliance with 16 AMSTAR 2 items.Method:We searched Web of Scie nce,Sino med,PubMed,Embase,and Cochra ne Library from 2016 to 2021,to get the meta-a nalyses of cog nitive in terve nti ons in Alzheimer's disease.The AMSTAR 2 was used to assess the methodological quality.Furthermore,we also explored the complia nce with AMSTAR.Resul ts:We in cluded 9 studies in our research.Of them,6 articles were rated as"extremely low",2 articles as"low"and 1 article as"high".Furthermore,the reporting rates for 16 AMSTAR 2 items ranged from 22.22%to 100%.Conclusion:The methodological quality of meta-analyses of cognitive interventions in Alzheimer's disease is not ideal,and there is still room for improvement.Future studies are supposed to explore the releva nt factors that possibly in flue nce the methodological quality.
基金
This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81603565)
Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Postgraduate Research Innovation Project(YJSKC-20201032).
