公共卫生管理于传染病预防工作的价值

The Value of Public Health Management in the Prevention of Infectious Diseases

目的研究公共卫生管理在传染病预防工作的应用价值。方法选取2020年6月—2021年3月在该疾控中心接受健康体检的100名受检者作为研究对象,根据随机数字表法将其分为两组,每组50名。对照组实施常规管理,观察组开展公共卫生管理,比较两种管理方法的干预效果。结果经管理后两组研究对象的传染病知识知晓程度均显著优于管理前,观察组管理后患者的传染病知识知晓评分明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经管理后观察组研究对象的满意度显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经管理后,观察组研究对象对传染病检查工作的依从性显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经管理后两组研究对象的生活质量评分均高于管理前,观察组管理后的生活质量评分明显大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);管理前比较两组受检者的传染病预防能力评分,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),管理后两组受检者的传染病预防能力评分均显著高于管理前,且观察组管理后的传染病预防能力评分明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论将公共卫生管理运用在传染病预防工作中更有利于传染病预防工作的顺利开展,可提高公民的传染病知晓率,提高其对传染病检查工作的依从性,同时也获得了民众的认可。

Objective To study the application value of public health management in the prevention of infectious diseases.Methods A total of 100 subjects who received a physical examination at the CDC from June 2020 to March 2021 were taken as the study subjects,and they were divided into two groups according to the random number table method,with 50 subjects in each group.The control group carried out routine management,and the observation group carried out public health management to compare the intervention effects of the two management methods.Results After management,the knowledge of infectious diseases of the two groups of study subjects was significantly better than that before management,and the score of knowledge of infectious diseases of patients in the observation group after management was significantly higher than that of the control groupthe difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The satisfaction degree of the subjects in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);after management,the subjects in the observation group had significantly higher compliance with infectious disease inspections than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);after management,the quality of life scores of the two groups of subjects were higher than those before management,and the quality of life scores of the observation group after management were significantly higher than those of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);Infectious disease prevention ability score,the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).the infectious disease prevention ability scores of the two groups of subjects after management were significantly higher than those before man agement,and the infectious disease prevention ability score of the observation group after management was significantly higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The use of public health management in the prevention of infectious diseases is more conducive to the smooth development of the prevention of infectious diseases,can increase citizens’awareness of infectious diseases,increase their compliance with infectious disease inspections,and also gain public’s approval.