期刊文献+

基础教育阶段课堂评价:功能“异化”及价值回归 被引量:11

Classroom Evaluation in Fundamental Education:Function Alienation and Possibility of Value Return
下载PDF
导出
摘要 课堂评价具有学习、诊断和反馈的功能,对改进学校教育教学起着重要作用。但在实践中,课堂评价产生了功能“异化”的问题:“繁难偏”的评价内容,使课堂评价学习功能缺失;课堂评价的结果被当作实施奖惩的参照,使反馈、修正功能变质;竞争、筛选功能“挤占”,成为课堂评价的“主角”,剥夺了学生的内生动力。上述问题主要是由错误逻辑所导致的:长期以来,课堂评价对学生“消极经验”的“污名化”;教师缺乏评价素养,对课堂评价产生错误认知;教育“内卷化”的日常渗透,致使课堂评价中的焦虑。因此,课堂评价应追求“三个回归”:回归“学生主体”,以促进学习为目的;回归课堂教学,以“评”促“教”;回归教育的意义,注重课堂评价对“人”的关怀。 Classroom evaluation has the functions of learning,diagnosis and feedback,which plays an important role in school education and teaching.There are several functional alienation problems in classroom evaluation.The assessment content is"complicated,difficult and unfamiliar",which makes the classroom assessment learning function missing.The results of classroom evaluation are mainly used to rewards and punishments.Competition and screening functions become the primary functions of classroom assessment,depriving students of endogenous motivation.The causes are as follows:stigmatization of students'wrong experiences;the lack of teachers'classroom assessment literacy;impact of"internalization"of education on classroom assessment.Classroom assessment should focus on"three returns":to return to the"students",to promote learning as the purpose;to return to classroom teaching,promoting teaching with evaluation,and improving teachers'teaching and research ability;to return to education,focusing on the care of"human"in classroom evaluation.
作者 韦林翠 Wei Lincui(East China Normal University)
机构地区 华东师范大学
出处 《当代教育科学》 北大核心 2021年第10期43-50,共8页 Contemporary Education Sciences
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费项目华东师范大学人文社会科学青年跨学科创新团队项目“国际测评视野下教师教育能力综合测评研究”(项目编号:2018ECNU-QKT003)的研究成果之一。
关键词 基础教育 课堂评价 教育价值 评价改革 fundamental education classroom evaluation educational value evaluation reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1Stiggins, R. J. Relevant classroom assessment training for teachers[J ]. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1991,10(1):7- 12.
  • 2AFT, NCME, NEA. Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students [ J ]. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1990,9(4) ,30 - 32.
  • 3Schafer, W. D. & Lissitz, R.W.( 1987 ). Measurement training for school personnel: Recommendations and reality [ J ]. Journal of Teacher Education, 38 (3), 57 - 63.
  • 4O' Sullivan, R. & Chanlnick,M. (1991). Measurement - related course work requirements for teacher certification and recertification [ J ]. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10 (2), 17 - 19, 23.
  • 5Wise, S. L., Lukin, L. E., & Roos, L. L. (1991). Teacher beliefs about training in testing and measurement[J]. Journal of Teacher Education, 42 ( 1 ), 37 - 42.
  • 6Schafer, W.D.(1993). Assessment literacy for teachers [J]. Theory into Practice, 32(2), 118 - 126.
  • 7Plake, B. S, Impera, J. C., & Fager, J. J. (1993). Assessment competencies of teachers: A national survey [ J ]. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(4), 10-12,39.
  • 8崔允泖,刘辉,郑东辉.我国义务教育阶段学生统考情况调研报告[J].全球教育展望,2008,37(3):15-29. 被引量:10
  • 9杨小芳,贺武华.新管理主义对公共教育改革的影响及其反思[J].教育发展研究,2013,33(10):73-77. 被引量:18
  • 10谈毅.新管理主义视域中日本高等教育治理政策的改革与反思[J].比较教育研究,2015,37(6):83-90. 被引量:11

共引文献252

同被引文献75

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部