破“四唯”和“唯SCI”政策的学者评论分析

Analysis of Scholars'Comments on Breaking Through the Evaluation Criteria Based on"Four Only"

[目的/意义]“破四唯”、破除“唯SCI”导向等一系列政策文件的发布引发了学术界科研人员广泛的讨论。学者对政策文件的评论逻辑性强,分析透彻,对人才评价和机构评估政策的进一步完善具有借鉴意义。[方法/过程]文章综合采用文献研究法,通过剖析学者对政策文件的观点和评述,归类学者热门讨论问题,并结合当前科研评价现状提出完善建议。[结果/结论]文章建议完善分类评价方式,推动代表作制度落地,优化科研资源配置,加强国内期刊培育,建立综合评价体系,强化学术伦理监管,以期为政府决策制定提供意见参考。

[Purpose/Significance]The publication of policy documents of breaking through the evaluation criteria based on"only thesis,only professional title,only academic degree,only awards"and"only SCI"has triggered extensive discussions among academic researchers.Scholars'discussions are logical and thorough,which can be used as a reference for the further improvement of talent evaluation and institutional evaluation policies.[Methods/Process]This paper comprehensively adopted the literature research method,analyzed scholars'views and comments on policy documents,classified scholars'concerns,and proposed suggestions based on the current status of scientific research evaluation.[Results/Conclusions]The paper proposed to improve the classification and evaluation methods,promote the implementation of the representative work system,optimize the allocation of scientific research resources,strengthen the cultivation of domestic journals,establish a comprehensive evaluation system,and strengthen academic ethics supervision,in order to provide references for government decision-making.