期刊文献+

药物治疗联合支架置入对症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的疗效及短期预后评价 被引量:7

Efficacy of drug therapy combined with stenting in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis and evaluation in short-term prognosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析药物治疗联合支架置入对症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄(SICAS)患者脑血流灌注、认知功能及短期预后的影响。方法选择住院治疗的124例SICAS患者为研究对象,依据治疗方案不同分为单纯组(60例,予以单纯药物治疗)和联合组(64例,在药物治疗基础上联合支架置入术)。治疗前、治疗第10天时,采用CT脑灌注成像分析局部脑血流速度(rCBF)、局部脑血容积(rCBV)、平均通过时间(MTr)。治疗前和治疗后3、14 d,记录2组蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)评分、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分。随访12个月,比较2组患者并发症发生率。结果与治疗前比较,联合组治疗后rCBF、rCBV均不同程度升高,MTr下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后,2组CBF、rCBV、MTr比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,2组MoCA评分均升高,且2组治疗后3、14 d MoCA评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后3、14 d,2组NIHSS评分下降,且联合组NIHSS评分低于单纯组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。联合组并发症总发生率低于单纯组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论药物治疗联合支架置入治疗SICAS能较好地改善脑血流和认知功能,提高神经功能,降低并发症发生率。 Objective To analyze the effect of drug therapy combined with stent implantation on cerebral perfusion,cognitive function and short-term prognosis in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis(SICAS).Methods A total of 124 hospitalized patients with SICAS were collected and divided into therapy-alone treatment group(60 cases,medicinal therapy only)and combination group(64 cases,medicinal therapy combined with stenting)according to the therapeutic methods.Regional cerebral blood flow(rCBF),regional cerebral blood volume(rCBV),and mean transit time(MTr)were analyzed by CT cerebral perfusion imaging before and 10 d after treatment.Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale(MoCA)score and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS)score were compared between two groups 3 and 14 days after treatment.The complication rate was compared between two groups after 12-month follow-up.Results Compared with before treatment,rCBF and rCBV of the combination group were increased,while MTr was decreased after treatment(P<0.05).After treatment,there were significant differences in CBF,rCBV and MTr between two groups(P<0.05).After treatment,the MoCA scores of the two groups were increased,and MoCA scores 3 and 14 days after treatment showed significant differences between the two groups(P<0.05).The NIHSS scores 3 and 14 days after treatment of two groups were significantly decreased,and the NIHSS score of the combination group was significantly lower than the therapy-alone treatment group(P<0.05).The incidence rate of complications of the combination group was significantly lower than that of the therapy-alone treatment group(P<0.05).Conclusion Stenting combined with medicinal therapy can improve the cerebral perfusion volume and cognitive function for SICAS,improve the nerve function,and decrease the incidence of complication.
作者 龙发青 苏庆杰 王德生 张余辉 王布飞 李建红 夏诗亮 尹钊 王海伦 LONG Faqing;SU Qingjie;WANG Desheng;ZHANG Yuhui;WANG Bufei;LI Jianhong;XIA Shiliang;YIN Zhao;WANG Hailun(Department of Neurology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University,Haikou,Hainan,570311)
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2021年第17期27-30,47,共5页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
基金 海南省教育厅高等学校科学研究项目(Hnky2017-37)。
关键词 症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄 支架置入术 脑血流灌注 认知功能 symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis stenting cerebral perfusion cognitive function
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1Kasner SE, Chimowitz MI, Lynn M J, et al. Predictors of ischemic stroke in the territory of a symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis[J]. Circulation, 2006, 113: 555-563.
  • 2Leng X, Wong KS, Liebeskind DS. Evaluating intracranial atherosclerosis rather than intracrauial stenosis[J]. Stroke, 2014, 45: 645-651.
  • 3Bodle JD, Feldmann E, Swartz RH, et al. High- resolution magnetic resonance imaging: an emerging tool for evaluating intracranial arterial disease[J]. Stroke, 2013, 44: 287-292.
  • 4Khan R, Nael K, Erly W. Acute stroke imaging: what clinicians need to know[J]. Am J Med, 2013, 126: 379-386.
  • 5Donahue M J, Strother MK, Hendrikse J. Novel MRI approaches for assessing cerebral hemodynamics in ischemic cerebrovascular disease[J]. Stroke, 2012, 43: 903-915.
  • 6Bokkers RP, Bremmer JP, van Berckel BN, et al. Arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI at multiple delay times: a correlative study with H(2)(15)O positron emission tomography in patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusion[J]. J Cereb Blood Flow metab,2010, 30: 222-229.
  • 7Bang OY, Saver JL, Kim SJ, et al. Collateral flow predicts response to endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke[J]. Stroke, 2011, 42: 693-699.
  • 8Shuaib A, Butcher K, Mohamrnad AA, et al. Collateral blood vessels in acute ischaemie stroke: a potential therapeutic target[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2011, 10: 909-921.
  • 9Calamante F, Thomas DL, Pell GS, et al. Measuring cerebral blood flow using magnetic resonance imaging techniques[J]. J Cereb Blood Flow metab, 1999, 19: 701-735.
  • 10Lyu J, Ma N, Liebeskind DS, et al. Arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging estimation of antegrade and collateral flow in unilateral middle cerebral artery stenosis[J]. Stroke, 2016, 47: 428-433.

共引文献81

同被引文献95

引证文献7

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部