“塔克-伍德”命题的内在张力

The Internal Tension of“Tucker-Wood”Thesis

"塔克-伍德"命题是探究马克思正义论的重要切入点,深入理解这场持续半个世纪的争论,需要分析塔克与伍德各自的论证思路,不能因二者的结论相似而忽略其差异。解读近年来相关文献,探析塔克关于马克思正义论的显性论证与隐性论证双重视角、伍德对马克思正义论的多层次论证及其对塔克观点的拒斥,可见二者在阐述视角、论证方式及具体依据等方面的内在张力。

“Tucker-Wood”Thesis is the important breakthrough point to explore Marx’s theory of justice.In order to gain a deeper understanding of this controversy that has lasted for half a century,it is necessary to analyze the argumentation of Tucker and Wood.We can not ignore their differences because their conclusions are similar.By interpreting the relevant literature in recent years,exploring the dual perspective of Tucker’s explicit and implicit argumentation on Marx’s theory of justice,Wood’s multi-level argumentations on Marx’s theory of justice,and his rejection of Tucker’s views,it can be seen that there are internal tensions in the angle of exposition,the demonstration methods,the specific basis and other aspects.