期刊文献+

母语类型对二语学习者使用英语动词论元构式的影响

The Effects of First Language Typology on the Use of English Verb Argument Constructions by L2 Learners
下载PDF
导出
摘要 母语的语言类型对英语动词论元构式可能有影响,但国内尚无相关研究发表。因此,本文通过对TOELF11语料库中母语为德语、汉语、西班牙语学习者的同题目同水平英语作文进行标注与分析,考察了二语学习者母语的语言类型对他们使用英语动词论元构式的影响。结果发现:(1)学习者的母语与目的语的类型相似性对VL和VOL构式中动词与介词的类符频数都没有显著影响,但对形符频数有显著影响,类型相似性越高,形符频数越高。(2)母语与目的语的类型相似性有助于提高动词论元构式使用的正确率。但类型相似性在两类构式中对动词错误都没有显著影响,对介词错误的边缘显著影响只在VOL构式中存在。 The effects of language typology on the acquisition of verb argument constructions(VACs)are an important issue,but have been unfortunately neglected in China.In order to fill the gap,this paper investigated how L1 German,L1 Chinese and L1 Spanish learners used VACs in parallel English argumentations from TOELF11 corpus.After data coding and analysis,the following findings were yielded.First,the typological similarity between learners’L1 and English did not significantly affect the type frequencies of verbs and prepositions,but exerted significant influence on their token frequencies,which suggested the facilitation of typological similarity.Second,typological similarity seemed to benefit the learners in using VACs correctly.In terms of its influence on errors,it was not significant in verbal errors in both VL and VOL constructions,but peripherally significant only in prepositional errors in the VOL constructions.
作者 蔡金亭 曾慧慧 CAI Jinting;ZENG Huihui(School of Foreign Studies,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai 200433,China;College of Foreign Languages,Qufu Normal University,Qufu 273165,China)
出处 《山东外语教学》 北大核心 2021年第5期43-53,共11页 Shandong Foreign Language Teaching
基金 教育部人文社科规划项目“母语迁移与语内因素对中国学生使用英语动词论元构式的影响研究”(项目编号:18YJA740001)的阶段性成果。
关键词 基于使用的二语习得 语言类型 母语迁移 动词论元构式 usage-based approaches language typology L1 transfer verb argument constructions
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献63

  • 1袁毓林.2004,述结式的结构和意义的不平衡性--从表达功能和历史来源的角度看.《汉语语法研究的认知视野》.北京:商务印书馆.277-99页.
  • 2日本现代中国语研究,2000,.
  • 3Aikhenvald, A. Y. and R. M. W. Dixon, eds. 2006. Serial Verb Constructions: A Crosslinguistic Typology. NY: Oxford University Press.
  • 4Aske, J. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the BLS. University of California, Berkeley. Pp. 1 -14.
  • 5Beavers, J., B. Levin, and S. Tham. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46,3:331 - 77.
  • 6Berthele, R. 2004. The typology of motion and posture verbs: A variationist account. In B. Kortmann, ed., Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Berlin/NY: Mouton de Gruyter, Pp. 93 - 126.
  • 7Chen,L.(陈亮).2005. The acquisition and use of motion event expressions in Chinese.Ph.D. diss. , University of Louisiana at Lafayette.
  • 8Chen,L.(陈亮).2007. The Acquisition and Use of Motion Event Expressions in Mandarin Chinese.Munchen, Germany: Lincom GmbH.
  • 9Chen, L. and J. Guo(郭建生).2009.Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language. Journal of Pragmatics 41,9 : 1749 - 66.
  • 10Croft, W., J. Barodal, W. Hollmann, V. Sotirova, and C, Taoka. 2010. Revising Talmy's typological classification of complex event constructions. In H.C. Boas, ed. , Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp. 201-36.

共引文献108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部