期刊文献+

自然保护地原住居民权益保护问题探究 被引量:5

Protection of Rights and Interests of Indigenous Residents in Nature Reserves
下载PDF
导出
摘要 长期以来,我国自然保护地多是采用“抢救式”保护模式进行设立,较少关注自然保护地原住居民的权益。作为“公益性”的自然保护地与“私益性”的原住居民权益之间存在一定的冲突,主要表现为生存权益、土地权益、生态补偿权益以及环境权益4个方面。通过对日本、美国、加拿大等典型国家自然保护地原住居民权益保护的经验总结借鉴,提出我国在尊重、认可自然保护地原住居民权利的前提下,应通过健全自然保护地相关法律制度、建立共建共享机制、完善生态补偿制度、构建社区共管体制等方式,进一步保障自然保护地原住居民的合法权益。 For a long time,nature reserves are mostly established by the“rescue”protection mode in China,and the rights and interests of the indigenous residents in the nature reserves are less concerned.There is a certain conflict between the“public benefit”of nature reserves and the“private benefit”of the rights of indigenous residents,which are mainly manifested in the four aspects of survival rights,land rights,ecological compensation rights and environmental rights.Based on the experience of protecting the rights and interests of indigenous residents in nature reserves in typical countries such as Japan,the United States and Canada,this paper suggested to improve the relevant legal system of nature reserves,establish a joint construction and sharing mechanism,improve the ecological compensation system and build a community co-management systemon the premise of respecting and recognizing the rights of indigenous residents in nature reserves.
作者 陶广杰 潘善斌 TAO Guangjie;PAN Shanbin(School of Law,Guizhou Minzu University,Guiyang 550025,China)
出处 《林业调查规划》 2021年第5期45-50,157,共7页 Forest Inventory and Planning
基金 司法部2019年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目“国家生态文明法治示范区建设综合评估”(19SFB5018) 贵州省研究生教育创新计划项目“贵州省自然保护区法治保障研究——以梵净山自然保护区为例”(黔教合YJSCXJH〔2019〕054).
关键词 自然保护地 原住居民权益 法律制度 社区共管 生态补偿 nature reserve rights and interests of indigenous residents legal system community co-management ecological compensation
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献155

共引文献481

同被引文献75

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部