摘要
20世纪70年代以来,"叙事主义"成为一股颇具声势的学术研究思潮,取代"分析的历史哲学",占据了历史哲学领域的主导地位。但在过去的几年中,"叙事主义"的理论热潮逐渐消退,现已不再是学界争相讨论的焦点问题,一批学者开始尝试探寻新的研究议题。乔尼-马蒂·库卡宁明确提出历史哲学应走出"叙事主义"的研究路径,迈向一个再度创新的阶段,即"后叙事主义"阶段。"后叙事主义"的"后",并不表示对"叙事主义"的全然摒弃,它对"叙事主义"的某些理念有所继承,并对其进行反思和批判,在此基础上建立和阐发新的理论观点。
Since the 1970 s,narrativism has become a powerful trend in academia,replacing "analytic historical philosophy"and occupying a dominant position in the field of philosophy of history. However,in the past few years,as this theoretical upsurge has gradually faded,it is no longer at the center of scholarly discussion. A group of scholars have begun to explore new research issues. Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen clearly proposed that the philosophy of history should transcend the approach of narrativism and enter a stage of reinnovation,that is,the stage of post-narrativism. The "post"in "post-narrativism"does not mean the complete rejection of narrativism. Instead, it inherits some ideas from narrativism. New theoretical development should be based on a reassessment and critical examination of these ideas.
出处
《史学理论研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第5期100-109,160,共11页
Historiography Bimonthly
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“古代中国与西方重大史学理论问题比较研究”(项目编号:20JJD770001)的阶段性成果。
