期刊文献+

重庆市万州区小学生减糖知识干预效果评价 被引量:1

Evaluation of Intervention Effect on Knowledge of Sugar Reduction Among Primary School Students in Wanzhou District,Chongqing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价小学生减糖干预活动的效果,为开展学龄儿童减糖工作提供科学依据。方法选择5所小学的四、五、六年级学生作为干预对象,开展为期1学期的干预活动,同时选择3所条件相当的小学四、五、六年级学生作为对照组。干预组实施健康教育为主的干预活动,对照组不主动实施任何形式干预活动。评估干预前后学生的减糖知识知晓情况,并使用倍差法分析干预的效果。结果干预前,干预组和对照组学生减糖知识得分分别为(5.72±1.75)分和(5.57±1.80)分,差异无统计学意义(t=3.184,P=0.074);干预后,干预组和对照组学生减糖知识得分分别为(6.94±1.45)分和(5.90±1.86)分,差异有统计学意义(t=297.591,P<0.00)。倍差法分析结果显示,干预净效应使减糖知识的知晓总分增加了0.842(0.743~0.941)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在调整年级、性别后,干预净效应使减糖知识的知晓总分增加了0.877(0.778~0.976)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对小学生采取干预可有效提高其对减糖知识的认知情况。 Objective To evaluate the effect of sugar reduction intervention on primary school students,so as to provide the scientific basis for sugar reduction of school-age children.Methods Students in grades 4,5 and 6 of 5 primary schools were selected as the intervention objects to carry out intervention activities for one semester,and students in grades 4,5 and 6 of 3 primary schools with equivalent conditions were selected as the control group.The intervention group was given health education based intervention activities,and the control group did not take the initiative to implement any form of intervention activities.The awareness of students’sugar reduction knowledge before and after the intervention was evaluated,and the effect of the intervention measures was analyzed by Difference in Differences(DID).Results Before the intervention,the scores of sugar reduction knowledge awareness of students in the intervention group and the control group were(5.72±1.75)and(5.57±1.80),respectively,with no significant difference(t=3.184,P=0.074);after the intervention,the scores of sugar reduction knowledge of students in the intervention group and the control group were(6.94±1.45)and(5.90±1.86),respectively,with significant difference(t=297.591,P<0.00).The results of DID showed that the net effect of intervention increased the total score of sugar reduction knowledge by 0.842(0.743-0.941),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);after adjusting the grade and gender,the net effect of intervention increased the total score of sugar reduction knowledge by 0.877(0.778-0.976),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Intervention for primary school students can effectively improve their cognition of sugar reduction knowledge.
作者 彭瑾 唐亮 张晓 Peng Jin;Tang Liang;Zhang Xiao(Wanzhou District Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Chongqing 404000,China)
出处 《健康教育与健康促进》 2021年第5期462-465,共4页 Health Education and Health Promotion
关键词 小学生 减糖 干预 效果评价 倍差法 Primary school Sugar reduction Intervention Effect evaluation Difference-in-Difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献117

  • 1曹若湘,符芸.北京市中小学生龋齿流行病学调查及影响因素分析[J].中国学校卫生,2005,26(10):863-864. 被引量:47
  • 2高鸿云,吴增强,邓伟,杨佐廷,黄玉梅.上海市中小学生自杀行为及心理社会相关因素的研究[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2007,2(1):32-37. 被引量:38
  • 3刘国栋 肯德基在中国[M]北京 机械工程出版社 2007.8
  • 4杨建文,李世荣,何广立,冯向明.江苏省大中小学生学习和睡眠时间现况调查[J].中国校医,2007,21(4):379-381. 被引量:12
  • 5葛可佑.中国营养科学全书[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.1049-1056.
  • 6U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U. S. Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2005 [ M ]. Washington DC: U. S. Government Printing Office,2005.
  • 7U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U. S. Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010 [ M ]. Washington DC: U. S. Government Printing Office, 2010.
  • 8MARRIOTT B F, OLSHO L. Intake of added sugars and selected nutrients in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003- 2006 [ J]. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2010,50 (3) :228-7852.
  • 9LEVY R F, CLARO R M. Availability of added sugars in Brazil: distribution, food sources and time trends[J]. Rev BrasEpidemiol, 2012,15(1):3-12.
  • 10STEYN N F, TEMPLE N J. Evidence to support a food-based dietary guideline on sugar consumption in South Africa [ J ]. BMC Public Health, 2012 (12) :502.

共引文献169

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部