我国第三人撤销之诉功能定位嬗变问题探析

An Analysis of the Evolution of the Function Positioning of the Third Party's Revocation in China

尽管立法已经确立了第三人撤销之诉的相关制度,但是学界对于我国第三人撤销之诉的质疑从未停息。时至今日,我国第三人撤销之诉已然“落地”八年之久,经过司法实践的充分检验,其制度构建和实际应用都反映出了许多无法回避的法律漏洞,制度运行偏离立法初衷,功能定位的嬗变导致立法目的的落空。在应急立法背景下,我国第三人撤销之诉的立法不仅没有达到立法的预期,而且已然导致第三人撤销之诉制度可能陷入“鸡肋”的困境。通过对我国第三人撤销之诉功能嬗变的问题研究,深度剖析我国第三人撤销之诉偏离立法初衷的原因,以期对完善我国第三人撤销之诉制度有所裨益。

Although the legislation has established the relevant system of third party’s revocation,the questioning of the academic circles have never stopped.Nowadays,China’s third party’s revocation have been landed for eight years.After full testing by judicial practice,the system construction and practical application have reflected many unavoidable legal loopholes,the operation of the system has deviated from the original intention of the legislation,and the evolution of functional positioning leads to the failure of the legislative purpose.In the context of emergency legislation,China’s legislation on third party’s revocation proceedings has not only failed to meet the expectations of the legislation,but has already led to the dilemma of the system.Through the study of the evolution of the function of the third party’s revocation in China,it deeply analyzed the reasons why the third party’s revocation deviates from the original intention of the legislation so as to improve the system in China.