期刊文献+

风险决策的情绪数理模型 被引量:1

An Algebraic Model Involving Emotions for Risky Decision Making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 已有风险决策模型只能对部分个体的决策结果作出解释。其根本原因在于3个方面:没有将个体情绪包含在内,所采用的单一决策模式及单向数据拟合方法不合理。这些问题需要采用4项措施来解决。依据情绪函数的一般特性,为结果及其实现概率分别设计情绪函数。根据信息的控制加工逻辑,确定情绪函数之间的加和关系,用多模式决策替代单一模式决策。建立双向拟合方法,替代单向拟合方法。从而建立决策情绪模型,使所有个体的选择行为都获得解释。利用前景理论经典案例及14个异常行为案例,对所建模型进行了验证。所建模型为风险决策问题的解决提供了一个新的途径. The existing risk decision-making models can only explain the selection results of some individuals. The fundamental reasons are attributed to three aspects: the emotion of an individual is not included;the single decision pattern and one-way data fitting method are unreasonable. The following four measures have been adopted to solve these problems.Emotion functions are designed for the outcome and its likelihood respectively, according to its general characteristics. The additive relation between emotion functions is determined, based on the controlled information processing model. A multiple decision pattern is used instead of the single decision pattern. Finally, a two-way fitting method is established to replace the one-way fitting one. Therefore, a risky decision-making model containing emotion is established to explain all individuals’ choices. The model is checked and verified by the classic cases of Prospect Theory and 14 anomalies. The developed model provides a novel solution to the problem of risky decision-making.
作者 张国锋 毛北行 杜虎兵 ZHANG Guofeng;MAO Beixing;DU Hubin(Institute of Behavior Computing,Xi'an Technological University,Xi'an 710021,China;Department of Mathematics and Physics,Zhengzhou Institute of Aeronautical Industry Management,Zhengzhou 450015,China)
出处 《工业工程》 北大核心 2021年第5期77-88,共12页 Industrial Engineering Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(61471288) 西安工业大学博士启动基金资助项目(204-000120)。
关键词 风险决策 情绪 双向拟合 risky decision making emotion two-way fitting
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1Joseph P. Forgas,Hui Bing Tan.To give or to keep? Affective influences on selfishness and fairness in computer-mediated interactions in the dictator game and the ultimatum game[J]. Computers in Human Behavior . 2013 (1)
  • 2Barnaby Dunn,Davy Evans,Dasha Makarova,Josh White,Luke Clark.Gut feelings and the reaction to perceived inequity: The interplay between bodily responses, regulation, and perception shapes the rejection of unfair offers on the ultimatum game[J]. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience . 2012 (3)
  • 3Lawrence Ian Reed,Katharine N. Zeglen,Karen L. Schmidt.Facial expressions as honest signals of cooperative intent in a one-shot anonymous Prisoner’s Dilemma game[J]. Evolution and Human Behavior . 2012 (3)
  • 4Detlef Fetchenhauer,Ton Groothuis,Julia Pradel.Not only states but traits — Humans can identify permanent altruistic dispositions in 20 s[J]. Evolution and Human Behavior . 2010 (2)
  • 5Casper J. Albers,Barteld P. Kooi,Willem Schaafsma.Trying to Resolve the Two-Envelope Problem[J]. Synthese . 2005 (1)
  • 6Christopher Butler.Prospect Theory and Coercive Bargaining. Journal of Conflict Resolution . 2007
  • 7Arthur Lupia,Jesse Menning."Politics and the Equilibrium of Fear: Can Strategies and Emotions Interact?". The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior . 2007
  • 8Tzieropoulos Hélène,de Peralta Rolando Grave,Bossaerts Peter,Gonzalez Andino Sara L.The impact of disappointment in decision making: inter-individual differences and electrical neuroimaging. Frontiers in human neuroscience . 2011
  • 9Longbing Cao,Philip S Yu.Behavior Computing:Modeling,Analysis,Mining and Decision. . 2012
  • 10Rodríguez L F,Ramos F.Computational Models of Emotions for Autonomous Agents:Major Challenges. Artificial Intelligence . 2012

共引文献6

同被引文献20

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部