期刊文献+

大孩与独生子女小学生攻击行为及其家庭环境影响因素比较 被引量:4

A comparison of aggressive behavior and influencing factors of family environment between firstborn and only children in primary school
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解大孩与独生子女小学生的攻击行为现状,分析其家庭环境影响因素并提出建议,为预防和控制儿童攻击行为的产生提供依据。方法采取分层整群抽样方法,选取蚌埠市3所小学,以二至六年级共计922名小学生作为研究对象进行问卷调查。调查问卷分为学生基本情况、家庭状况、学生攻击行为评估三部分。结果男生中,7岁独生子女的总体攻击得分[26.0(22.0,34.5)]高于大孩20.0[(17.5,26.5)],9岁大孩的总体攻击得分[27.5(23.0,34.3)]高于独生子女[23.0(18.5,28.5)],8岁大孩的躯体攻击维度得分[7.0(4.0,11.0)]高于独生子女[5.0(3.0,8.0)](Z值分别为1.97,2.39,2.11,P值均<0.05)。女生中,8岁独生子女的躯体攻击维度得分[5.0(3.0,7.0)]高于大孩[3.0(3.0,4.0)],12岁大孩的敌意维度得分[7.0(6.0,8.0)]高于独生子女[4.5(3.3,9.0)](Z值分别为2.48,1.98,P值均<0.05)。多元线性回归分析发现,大孩中男生除敌意外的其他攻击行为得分均高于女生,父亲文化程度越高者躯体攻击和敌意得分越低(P值均<0.05);独生子女中,年龄越大者言语攻击得分越高,家庭经济条件一般及较好者躯体攻击得分低于较差者,其他陪伴情况者的愤怒和敌意得分高于父母双方陪伴者,父亲文化程度越高者敌意得分越低(P值均<0.05)。结论良好的家庭经济条件、较高的父母陪伴质量和合理的教养方式,可减少儿童攻击行为的产生,促进儿童身心健康发展。 Objective To understand aggressive behavior and associated family determinants of firstborn and only children in primary school,so as to provide the basis for child aggressive behavior prevention.Methods Using stratified cluster sampling method,922 pupils from grade 2 to grade 6 were selected from three primary schools in Bengbu.The questionnaire survey included general information,family background and child aggressive behaviors.Results Among boys,the 7-year-old only child scored[26.0(22.0,34.5)]higher than firstborn children[20.0(17.5,26.5)]in overall aggression,and the 9-year-old firstborn child[27.5(23.0,34.3)]scored higher than the only child[23.0(18.5,28.5)].The scores of 8-year-old firstborn child in the dimension of physical aggression[7.0(4.0,11.0)]were higher than that of only child[5.0(3.0,8.0)](Z=1.97,2.39,2.11,P<0.05).Among girls,8-year-old only child scored higher[5.0(3.0,7.0)]in the dimension of physical aggression than that of the firstborn child[3.0(3.0,4.0)],and the 12-year-old firstborn child scored[7.0(6.0,8.0)]higher in the dimension of hostility than that of the only child[4.5(3.3,9.0)](Z=2.48,1.98,P<0.05).Multiple linear regression analysis found that boys of firstborn children scored higher in all dimensions of aggressive behavior than those of girls except hostility,and paternal education was negatively associated with physical aggression and hostility(P<0.05).Age was positively associated with verbal aggression among the only children(P<0.05).Family economic status was negatively associated with physical aggression(P<0.05).Paternal education was negatively associated with hostility among students with anger and hostility of family members higher than that of parents(P<0.05).Conclusion Higher family economic status,high quality of parent company and appropriate parenting style can reduce the occurrence of children's aggressive behavior and promote healthy physical and psychological development.
作者 严超 杨少萌 吴若瑶 刘影 姚荣英 YAN Chao;YANG Shaomeng;WU Ruoyao;LIU Ying;YAO Rongying(School of Public Health,Bengbu Medical College,Bengbu 233000,Anhui Province,China)
出处 《中国学校卫生》 CAS 北大核心 2021年第10期1469-1474,1479,共7页 Chinese Journal of School Health
基金 安徽省高等学校人文社会科学研究重大项目(SK2018ZD015) 蚌埠医学院自然科学类创新团队项目(BYKC201901)。
关键词 独生子女 攻击 家庭 回归分析 精神卫生 学生 Only child Aggression Family Regression analysis Mental health Students
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献77

  • 1樊为,吴薇莉.不同文化程度父母的教养方式对大学生心理健康的影响及对策[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2011,32(S3):233-235. 被引量:6
  • 2黄玉娇,胥兴春.幼儿园教室墙面环境与幼儿攻击性行为探究[J].天津市教科院学报,2013,25(4):72-74. 被引量:1
  • 3张文新,纪林芹,宫秀丽,张茜,王益文,陈欣银.3~4岁儿童攻击行为发展的追踪研究[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):49-52. 被引量:63
  • 4余毅震,黄艳,史俊霞.青少年攻击行为与内分泌因素关系的研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(14):1909-1911. 被引量:13
  • 5American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Text revision. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association ,2000.
  • 6Parrott D J, Giancola PR. Addressing" the criterion problem" in the assessment of aggressive behavior: development of a new taxonomic system. Aggress Violent Beh,2007, 12(4) :280 -299.
  • 7Suris A, Lind L. Measures of aggressive behavior: overview of clinical and research instruments. Aggress Violent Beh, 2004, 9 (3) :165 - 227.
  • 8Buss AH, Perry M. The aggression questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1992, 63(3) :452 -459.
  • 9Vigil - Colet A, Lorenzo - Seva U, Morales - Vives F. Factor structure of the Buss - Perry aggression questionnaire in different samples and languages. Aggressive Behavior, 2005,31 (7) :601 -608.
  • 10Bryant FB, Smith BD. Refining the architecture of aggression: a measurement model for the Buss - Perry aggression questionnaire. J Res Pers, 2001, 35(2) : 138 -167.

共引文献35

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部