期刊文献+

聋校数学课堂教学与课程标准一致性分析研究 被引量:2

Research on the Consistency Between Mathematics Classroom Teaching and Curriculum Standards in Schools for the Deaf
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以聋校一年级上学期数学课堂教学实施为研究对象,以美国学者安德鲁·波特等人建构的“SEC”一致性分析模型为主要研究工具,分析聋校数学课堂教学实施与数学课程标准的一致性程度。结果表明:聋校一年级上学期数学课堂教学实施与课程标准已达到一致性水平,但教学实施总体要求偏低;“图形与几何”“综合与实践”领域,0—5年和21年以上教龄段教师课堂教学实施与课程标准未达到一致性水平,其他领域和其他教龄段教师已达到一致性水平。可通过研读课程标准、加强教师培训、改善评价方式、推进教学改革等方法,提高一致性水平。 Taking the mathematics classroom teaching in the first semester of the first grade of the deaf school as the research object and the"SEC"consistency analysis model as the main research tool,this paper analyzes the consistency between the mathematics classroom teaching in the deaf school and the mathematics curriculum standard.The results show that the mathematics classroom teaching and curriculum standards in the first semester of deaf school have reached the consistency level,but the overall teaching requirements are low;in the fields of"graphics and geometry"and"synthesis and practice",classroom teaching and curriculum standards have not reached the consistency level in the teaching age groups of 0-5 years and more than 21 years,and have reached the consistency level in other fields and other age groups.The level of consistency could be improved by studying curriculum standards,strengthening teacher training,improving evaluation methods and promoting teaching reform.
作者 田兆丰 田寅生 TIAN Zhaofeng;TIAN Yinsheng(Jiangsu Branch,China United Network Communication Co.Ltd.,Nanjing,210017;School of Special Education,Nanjing Normal University of Special Education,Nanjing,210038)
出处 《现代特殊教育》 2021年第18期40-45,共6页 Modern Special Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“特殊教育学校义务教育数学课程标准与教学实施一致性研究”(18YJA880075)阶段性成果。
关键词 聋校数学 新课程标准 教学 一致性 mathematics in schools for the deaf new curriculum standards teaching consistency
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

  • 1Norman,L.Webb. Aligument of Science and Maths Standards and Assessments in Four States. Council of Chief State School Officers. Washington,DC August, 1999.23.
  • 2U.S.Congress.House of Representatives. Improving Americans Schools.Act.Washington. DC:U.S. Government Printing Office. 1994. 8.
  • 3Porter.How SEC.Measures Alignment.Educational Researcher, 1997(5):2,12,9,5,8.
  • 4Norman L.Webb. Criteria for Ahgnment of Expectation and Asses Sment in Maths and Science Education. Washington. DC :National Institute for Science Education University of Wisconsin- Madison and Council of Chief State School Officers, 1997.14-22.
  • 5Porter, A. C. Creating a System of School Process Indicators.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1991, (1): 29.
  • 6富兰.教育变革新意义[M].赵中建,译.北京:教育科学出版社,2005:126.
  • 7Centennial Board of Cooperative Educational Serv- ices, Standards-based Education Design Operator's Manual, Alexandria Virginia: ASK Publications &ProfessionaI Development, 2002:142-144.
  • 8安德森,等.学习、教学和评估的分类学[M].皮连生,主译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2008:13-15.
  • 9Chappuis S, Stiggins R J. Assessment for Learning : An Action Guide for School Leaders (2th Edition) [Z]. Educational Testing Service, 2005 (22).
  • 10American Federation of Teachers (2003). Setting Strong Standards [EB/OL]. http: //archive aft. org/ pubs-report s/downloads/teachers/settingstmng, pdf. [2010 5-25~.

共引文献119

同被引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部