期刊文献+

经济危机与周期性政治重组 被引量:3

Economic Crises and Periodic Political Realignments
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对经济危机在不同政体类型国家的差异性影响,作者基于形式模型提出了一个整合性分析框架,用于解释不同政体类型在经济危机冲击下的政治转型规律。通过模型推导经济危机对政体变迁存在条件式影响,可发现资本主导型和政治主导型国家在面临冲击时政治重组的逻辑有所不同,但均出现与现行政体相反的政治转型方向,呈现钟摆式变动的特征。在资本主导型政体下,经济危机促使经济精英加大对民众的利益剥夺,从而推动民众与政治精英建立联盟,使政治—民众转向成为可能;在政治主导型政体下,经济危机促使政治精英加大对经济精英的剥夺,利益受损的经济精英转而与民众结成联盟,这种政治重组将为资本—民众转型提供动力。实证部分采用面板数据进行统计分析,发现初始政体类型会显著调节经济危机对政体造成的影响。作者选取泰国、白俄罗斯、印度和美国四个国家作为极端案例,揭示了政治、经济精英和民众在危机时的微观互动机制,并对未来新的世界政治秩序做出预判。 This article develops a formal model to explain the political transitions of different regimes under the impact of economic crises. It can be deduced from the model that countries respond and evolve in a conditional way when facing major shocks. Under those regimes dominated by capital, economic crises will damage the interests of ordinary people more than other groups, pushing them to align themselves with political elites, thus giving rise to a populist authoritarian shift. Under the regimes dominated by political elites however, economic shocks tend to make economic elites suffer more losses, driving them to establish political coalitions with the masses.Such political realignment would provide impetus and opportunities for a democratic transition. Empirically, the authors conduct statistical analyses based on panel data and find that the previous regime type plays a moderation role in the correlation between economic crises and regime change. Then, four extreme cases are dissected to illustrate the micro mechanisms of interactions between political elites, economic elites, and the masses. This study helps to understand different political reactions of countries confronting the same crisis, such as the economic crisis entailing the COVID-19 pandemic, which may shed light on the new global political order.
作者 周强 蒋光明 Zhou Qiang;Jiang Guangming(the School of Government,Peking University)
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第9期59-83,157,共26页 World Economics and Politics
基金 2019年北京市社会科学基金一般项目“经济冲击、民粹主义与西方政治重组”(项目编号:19ZGB004)的阶段性成果 北京大学公共治理研究所“结合新冠肺炎疫情防控对于切实提高我国国际话语权若干路径的研究”课题研究项目资助。
关键词 经济危机 政体形式 钟摆式变动 政治重组 新冠肺炎疫情 economic crisis political regime pendulum motion political realignment COVID-19
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1周方银.形式模型与国际关系研究[J].外交评论(外交学院学报),2006,23(4):93-100. 被引量:5
  • 2David A. Wilson, The United States and the Future of Thailand, New York. NY. Praeger Publishers, 1970, p. 115.
  • 3Pasuk Phongpaichit and Chris Baker, " Chao Sua, Chao Pho, Chao Thi . Lords of Thailand's Transition", in Ruth McVey, ed. , Money and Power in Provincial Thailand, Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, NIAS Publishing, 2000, p. 33.
  • 4Fred W. Riggs, Thailand. The Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity, Honolulu. The East-West Center Press, 1966, p. 252.
  • 5[泰]朗讪·塔纳蓬潘.《泰国经济政策的决策机制.历史与政治经济学分析(1932-1987年)》,曼谷.经理人出版社,1996年,第97页.
  • 6Anek Laothamatas, Business Associations and the New Political Economy of Thailand . From Bureaucratic Polity to lib- eral Corporatism, Boulder, Col. . Westview Press, 1992, pp. 58 - 65.
  • 7陈尚懋.《塔克辛执政前后的泰国政商关系》,(台湾)《问题与研究》2008年第47卷第2期.
  • 8Bangkok Post, April 18, 1989.
  • 9[泰]《曼谷事务》1996年11月17日.
  • 10[泰]萨穆德·苏拉卡伽.《泰国的26次革命与政变(1546年-1964年)》,曼谷.媒体印刷出版社,1964年,第511页.

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部