期刊文献+

图书馆数字化时代读者个人信息刑法保护的限度 被引量:16

The Limit of the Criminal Law Protection of Library Readers’ Personal Information in Digital Era
原文传递
导出
摘要 图书馆数字化建设为读者带来高效的阅读体验,也带来读者个人信息安全的风险,需要刑法介入以保护法益和规避风险。然而,当前刑法规制存在早期化和扩大化趋势,有必要运用教义学方法论甄别刑法规制侵犯读者个人信息行为的边界以避免扩张处罚。首先,坚守利益平衡观,将保护读者权益和促进信息流通作为刑法规制读者信息应遵循的基本原则;其次,采用领域理论,依私密性程度不同,将不同类型的读者个人信息依次归入最外层的社会领域、中间层的私人领域、核心层的隐私领域,刑法的保护程度也随私密性程度增加而递增;最后,采用实质解释论,将"违反国家有关规定"解释为入罪的构成要件要素,将实质法益侵害性和不法目的性解释为"提供"或"出售"读者个人信息行为入罪的必备要件。 Digital construction of library provides readers with efficient reading experience, but it also brings the risk of personal information security, so it is necessary to introduce penal laws to protect the legal interests and avoid risks.But the current punishment system has the trends of early punishment and over-punishment, it is necessary to use teaching methodology to violate the boundary of readers’ personal information behavior to avoid expanding punishment.First of all, the concept of balancing interests should be adhered to, and the protection of readers’ rights and interests as well as the promotion of information circulation should be regarded as the basic principle that should be followed in protection of readers’ information in criminal laws and regulations.Secondly, using field theory, according to the degree of privacy, different types of readers’ personal information are classified into the outermost social field, middle private field and core privacy field.The degree of protection of criminal law also increases with the degree of privacy.Finally, the substantive interpretation theory is adopted to interpret the "violation of the relevant state provisions" as the essential elements of the crime, and interpret the substantive legal benefit infringement and illegal purpose as the essential elements of the crime of "providing" or "selling" the readers’ personal information behavior.
作者 童云峰 金洁 Tong Yunfeng;Jin Jie
出处 《图书馆学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第18期31-38,共8页 Research on Library Science
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“互联网法治化治理问题研究”(项目编号:16BFX031)的研究成果之一。
关键词 数字图书馆 读者个人信息 领域理论 规制限度 digital library readers’personal information field theory regulatory limits
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献207

共引文献1858

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部