个人信息司法保护的举证责任问题

On the Burden of Proof of Judicial Protection of Personal Information

电子商务如火如荼发展的过程中,商业运营者对消费者的个人信息肩负着重要的信息安全保护义务,就此产生个人信息纠纷之时,自然人和企业之间举证责任的划分以及证明标准和路径深刻影响着个人信息保护案件的裁判结果,即举证责任分配是个人信息司法保护中的核心问题,且在目前的司法实践个案中存在显著差异。我国新近通过的《个人信息保护法》建立了统一的个人信息保护制度,明确了个人信息处理者"证明自己没有过错"的义务。本文通过案例分析及比较研究为相关立法和司法实践提供参考,同时为完善我国个人信息保护制度提出建议。

In the process of rapid development of e-commerce,Commercial Operators are responsible for Consumers’ personal information security.The allocation of the burden of proof between natural persons and enterprises,as well as the standard and path of proof profoundly affects the judgment results in personal information protection cases,that is,the allocation of the burden of proof is the key point in the judicial protection of personal information,and there are significant differences in the related cases.The"Personal Information Protection Law"that is newly enacted establishes a unified personal information protection system and clarifies the obligation of data processors to "prove that they are not at fault".This article aims to provide a reference for burden of proof through specific cases and comparison of foreign laws and give suggestions for improving the protection of personal information in our country.