“宗教大法官”的两种解读模式——罗赞诺夫与梅列日科夫斯基话语中的灵与肉的嬗变

Two Interpretation Approaches of“the Grand Inquisitor”:The Variation of Soul and Flesh in the Discourses of Rozanov and Merezhkovsky

罗赞诺夫与梅列日科夫斯基都对陀思妥耶夫斯基《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》"宗教大法官"一章进行了阐释。罗赞诺夫在《论宗教大法官的传说》中支持以耶稣为代表的灵魂原则,反对以"宗教大法官"为代表的肉体原则,发生思想转向以后支持肉体原则,反对以耶稣为代表的灵魂原则。梅列日科夫斯基在《托尔斯泰与陀思妥耶夫斯基》中主张将以耶稣为代表的灵魂原则与以"宗教大法官"为代表的肉体原则合二为一,发生思想转向以后认为耶稣本人就是灵魂原则与肉体原则的合一。

Both Rozanov and Merezhkovsky made their comments on the chapter of"The Grand Inquisitor"in Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov.In The Legend of the Grand Inquisitor,Rozanov preferred the principle of soul represented by Jesus Christ to the principle of flesh represented by"the Grand Inquisitor".And after the turn of religious thought,Rozanov preferred the principle of flesh to the principle of soul represented by Jesus Christ.Merezhkovsky struggled for a combination of the principle of soul represented by Jesus Christ and the principle of flesh represented by"the Grand Inquisitor"in Tolstoy and Dostoevsky.And after the turn of religious thought,Merezhkovsky was convinced that Jesus Christ is the combination of the principle of soul and the principle of flesh.