行政复议中止的纠纷化解路径——以“实质性解决行政争议”为视角

Dispute Resolution Path of Administrative Reconsideration Suspension:From the Perspective of“Substantial Settlement of Administrative Disputes”

我国行政复议中止制度仅对中止事由进行了详细规定,而如何启动行政复议中止及恢复案件审理的规定都不明晰,这使得实践中极易引发行政复议中止纠纷。在行政权主动扩张和司法权过度谦抑的背景下,申请人既没有提出异议的行政渠道,转而寻求法院进行司法审查的效果亦十分有限,从而造成了对行政复议及时原则和司法最终救济原则的破坏。具有丰富内涵的“实质性解决行政争议”命题对此能提供一定的思路,在这一理论的指引下,当发生行政复议中止纠纷时,行政复议机关应当允许行政复议申请人先向其提出异议,以追求纠纷的最便利解决;当行政复议内部救济未果,法院应当对符合条件的行政复议中止进行实质审查,确保司法最终救济原则的实现;而随着检察机关在行政争议实质性解决中的重要性不断攀升,应当发挥其对行政复议中止纠纷解决的监督作用。

The suspension system of administrative reconsideration in China only stipulates the reasons for suspension in detail.But it is not clear that how to start the suspension of administrative reconsideration and resume administrative reconsideration.This makes it very easy to cause disputes over administrative reconsideration in practice.In this regard,the applicant has no administrative channels to raise objections,and the effect of seeking judicial review by the court is limited.It constitutes a breach of the principle of timely administrative reconsideration and the principle of final judicial relief.The proposition of“substantial resolution of administrative disputes”with rich connotations can provide certain ideas for this problem.Under the guidance of this theory,when an administrative reconsideration suspension dispute occurs,the administrative reconsideration agency should allow the administrative reconsideration applicant to raise an objection to it in order to pursue the most convenient settlement of the dispute.When the internal remedy of the administrative reconsideration fails,the court shall conduct a substantive review of the suspension of the administrative reconsideration that meets the conditions to ensure the realization of the principle of judicial final remedy.As the importance of procuratorates in the substantive resolution of administrative disputes continues to rise,they should play their role in supervising the suspension of administrative reconsideration disputes.