构建中国特色国家安全学:学科、学术与话语

Building National Security Science with Chinese Characteristics:Discipline,Academic and Discourse

[研究目的]哲学社会科学的风格、气派与特色,是学术发展到一定阶段的必然产物,是学科实力的象征,也是话语自信的表现。对于国家安全学这门新兴学科而言,也同样要遵循哲学社会科学的一般发展规律。以教育部将国家安全学正式增列为交叉学科门类下的一级学科为契机,可以解析出构建中国特色国家安全学的数项基本标准。[研究方法]以“学科”“学术”和“话语”为三个具体的切入视域,可以归纳出数十年来国家安全学学科建设的中国经验及其本土资源,并透析出未来语境下中国特色国家安全学发展可能面临的枷锁及其障碍。[研究结论]新时代下,国家安全学学科建设不仅要遵循学理的逻辑,更要遵循现实的逻辑,亟需以“思想在场”“技术在场”和“话语在场”为三大指标,以《情报杂志》等重要期刊为学术平台,并结合中国国家安全学建设的本土化资源,构筑中国特色国家安全学的发展进路。

[Research purpose]The style and characteristics of philosophy and social sciences are the inevitable products of academic development to a certain stage,the symbol of discipline strength and the expression of discourse confidence.For the new discipline of national security,we should also follow the general development law of philosophy and social sciences.Taking the opportunity of the Ministry of Education to officially add national security as the first-class subject under the interdisciplinary category,several basic dimensions of the construction of national security with Chinese characteristics can be analyzed.[Research method]Taking"discipline","academic"and"discourse"as three specific perspectives,we can summarize the Chinese experience and local resources of national security discipline construction in the past decades,and analyze the shackles and obstacles that the construction of national security science with Chinese characteristics may face in the future context.[Research conclusion]In the new era,the discipline construction of national safety science should not only follow the logic of academic theory,but also follow the logic of reality.It is urgent to take"thought presence","technology presence"and"discourse presence"as three indicators,and combine with the localization resources of China's national safety science construction to build the development path of national safety science with Chinese characteristics.