美式国有企业规则的推行路径与逻辑谬误——基于与澳式规则的比较分析

The Promotion Path and Logic Fallacy of American State-owned Enterprise Rules:Based on a Comparison with Australian Rules

美式与澳式国企规则分别代表了竞争中性推行的两条不同路径。前者是基于所有制歧视的制度扩张,后者则是基于国内改革实践的制度推广。经比较分析可知,美式国企规则在奉行原则方面以"竞争中性"之名行"竞争非中性"之实、在制度归属方面偏离竞争政策框架实施所有制歧视、在贯彻落实方面采取双重标准且存在内部逻辑矛盾、在国际推广方面无国内实践基础且有违国际共识等逻辑谬误。中国可借鉴澳式国企规则的推行路径,在竞争政策框架内构建中式竞争中性制度体系,参与全球制度竞争。

The state-owned enterprise rules developed by the US and Australia represent two diverse paths of promoting competitive neutrality.The former is expanded based on ownership discrimination,while the latter is promoted based on domestic reform practices.It can be concluded by comparative analysis that the American path has some logical errors,such as practicing competitive non-neutrality in the name of competitive neutrality,deviating from the framework of competition policy by undertaking ownership discrimination,adopting double standard in implementation with internal logic contradiction,and lacking domestic practices as well as international consensus.China can construct a Chinese-style competitive neutrality system within the framework of competition policy and participate in institutional competition internationally by drawing lessons from the Australian path.