期刊文献+

行血管内介入手术治疗非急性期眼段症状性ICAO患者预后不良的危险因素 被引量:1

Risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with symptomatic ocular ICAO undergoing endovascular intervention
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨行血管内介入手术治疗非急性期眼段症状性颈内动脉闭塞(Internal carotid artery occlusion, ICAO)患者预后不良的危险因素。方法回顾性分析本院2010年1月-2018年12月收治并行血管内介入手术治疗非急性期眼段症状性ICAO患者共216例的临床资料,根据随访2年预后情况分组,采用Logistic回归模型评价预后不良的独立危险因素。结果入选且接受血管内介入手术患者出院当天实现血管开通208例,开通成功率为96.30%(208/216),预后不良率为19.23%(40/208);同时出院当天改良Rankin量表(Modified Rankin scale, mRS)评分和美国国立卫生院神经功能缺损量表(Natinal Institute of health strke scale, NIHSS)评分均显著少于入院当天(P<0.05);2组年龄、合并高血压病、2型糖尿病(Type 2 diabetes, T2DM)及冠心病的比例均有明显差异(P<0.05);Logistic回归模型多因素分析显示,合并高血压病和T2DM是行血管内介入手术治疗非急性期眼段症状性ICAO患者预后不良的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论行血管内介入手术治疗非急性期眼段症状性ICAO患者预后不良与合并高血压病和T2DM关系密切。 Objective To investigate the risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with symptomatic ocular ICAO undergoing endovascular intervention. Methods Clinical data of 216 patients with symptomatic ocular ICAO undergoing endovascular intervention were retrospectively selectedduring the period from January 2010 to December 2018. All patients were grouped according to the clinical prognosis for 2-year follow-up. Logistic regression model was used to evaluate the independent risk factors of poor prognosis. Results 208 cases in all patients achieved vascular opened after endovascular treatment and the success rate was 96.30%(208/216) and the poor prognosis rate was 19.23%(40/208). The mRS score and NIHSS score after treatment were significantly lower than untreatment(P<0.05). There were significant differences in age, combination proportion of hypertension, T2 DM and coronary heart disease between 2 groups(P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that hypertension and T2 DM were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with non acute ocular symptomatic ICAO(P<0.05). Conclusion The poor prognosis of patients with non acute ocular symptomatic ICAO treated by endovascular intervention is closely related to hypertension and T2 DM.
作者 李帅 任玉伟 井延涛 孙岩 李直 岳新灿 Li Shuai;Ren Yuwei;Jing Yantao(Neuro Intensive Care Unit,Zhoukou Central Hospital of Henan Province,Zhoukou City Henan Province 466000)
出处 《卒中与神经疾病》 2021年第5期517-520,共4页 Stroke and Nervous Diseases
关键词 介入手术 颈内动脉闭塞 预后 危险因素 Intervention surgery Internal carotid artery occlusion Prognosis Risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1中国医师协会介入医师分会神经介入专业委员会,中华医学会放射学分会介入放射学组,中国卒中学会复合介入神经外科分会,国家脑卒中防治工程委员会缺血性卒中介入治疗专业委员会,薛绛宇,蔡栋阳,刘傲飞,姜卫剑,焦力群,李天晓,万杰清,王东海,顾宇翔,洪波,徐斌,李聪慧,刘一之,郭再玉,张合亮,张帆,常斌鸽,黄理金,黄亚波,赵同源.慢性颈内动脉闭塞再通治疗中国专家共识[J].中华介入放射学电子杂志,2019,7(1):1-6. 被引量:51

二级参考文献1

共引文献50

同被引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部