课程史书写中的历史解释问题——以坦纳与克利巴德的课程史著作为例

The Problem of Historical Interpretation in the Writing of Curriculum History:Taking the Tanners’and Kliebard’s Works as an Example

历史解释不仅是史学理论的中心问题,也是课程史书写必须面对的重要问题。澄清历史哲学中关于历史解释的争论,有助于我们认识课程史中的历史解释问题。为了能够具体分析课程史中的历史解释问题,本文选取了两本经典的课程史著作为分析案例,以此为基础,探讨课程史研究是如何运用假设与解释框架、如何处理历史的真实与逻辑一致性的关系以及在历史事件的关联中如何进行历史解释等问题,以期对怎样通过历史解释呈现课程史的意义这个问题作出回答。

Historical interpretation is the central issue of historical theory and one of the critical issues that must be faced in the writing of curriculum history.Sorting out and clarifying the controversies on historical interpretation in historical philosophy will help us understand the historical interpretation issues in curriculum history.In order to analyze the historical interpretation issues in curriculum history,this article selected two classical curriculum history books as references and analysis cases.Based on the analysis,it explored how curriculum history uses assumptions and interpretation frameworks,how to deal with the relationship between the truth and logic of history,and how to carry out a historical interpretation in the association of historical events.From the analysis,we hope to answer how to present the meaning of curriculum history through historical interpretation.