摘要
基于对山东、河南和重庆等地抽样调查所得1898份问卷的统计分析,从网络风险发生的可能性和后果严重程度两方面对青少年视野中的网络风险进行研究。研究发现:青少年对网络风险存在认知偏差。青少年认为,相对于其他人而言,网络风险发生在其身上的可能性更小;网络风险即便发生,对青少年本人产生的后果也不如对其他人严重。不仅如此,青少年网络风险认知还存在地域差异。在网络风险发生可能性方面,河南青少年感知到的风险最大,重庆次之,山东最小。而在网络风险发生后果严重程度方面,河南青少年和重庆青少年感知到的风险没有显著区别。当感知到的网络风险发生在其他人身上时,山东青少年感知到的风险要显著小于河南与重庆青少年;而当感知到的网络风险发生在青少年本人身上时,山东青少年和河南、重庆青少年间并无显著差异。
Based on the statistical analysis of 1898 questionnaires from the sampling survey in Shandong,Henan and Chongqing,cyber risk in the view of adolescents is studied from two aspects:the possibility of cyber risk and the severity of the consequences.The results show that adolescents have cognitive bias on cyber risk.Adolescents believe that cyber risk is less likely to happen to them,compared with the other people.Even if cyber risk occurs,the consequences to the adolescents themselves are not as serious as to other people.Moreover,there are regional differences in adolescents’perception of cyber risk.In terms of the possibility of cyber risk,the risk perceived by adolescents in Henan is the largest,followed by Chongqing and Shandong.However,in terms of the severity of the consequences of cyber risk,there is no significant difference between Henan adolescents and Chongqing adolescents.When the perceived cyber risk happens to other people,the perceived risk of Shandong adolescents is significantly less than that of Henan adolescents and Chongqing adolescents;when the perceived cyber risk happens to adolescents themselves,there is no significant difference between Shandong adolescents and Henan and Chongqing adolescents.
作者
余建华
孙丽
YU Jianhua;SUN Li(School of Public Administration, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China;School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China)
出处
《北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》
2021年第5期63-68,共6页
Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
重庆市教育科学“十三五”规划2020年度重点课题(2020-GX-119)。
关键词
青少年
网络风险
风险认知
认知偏差
地域差异
adolescents
cyber risk
risk perception
cognitive bias
regional differences