期刊文献+

284例胃肠手术患者切口感染病原菌分布特征以及血清PCT、hs-CRP、IL-6、IL-2水平变化分析 被引量:1

Analysis of Pathogens’ Distribution and Changes of PCT, hs-CRP, IL-6 and IL-2 in 284 Patients with Postoperative Incision Infection after Gastrointestinal Surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析胃肠手术患者术后切口感染的病原菌分布特征及血清降钙素原(PCT)、超敏C-反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、白细胞介素-2(IL-2)水平变化对感染的影响。方法:抽取医院2018年1月—2019年12月收治的行胃肠手术患者284例临床资料,依据手术切口感染情况分为感染组(n=29)和未感染组(n=255);分析与比较其术后48 h时切口组织液中感染病原菌的特征以及PCT、hs-CRP、IL-6、IL-2水平变化对术后切口感染的预测效能。结果:284例胃肠手术患者标本中,分离出病原菌株43株,其中革兰阴性菌21株(占48.84%,以铜绿假单胞菌为主)、革兰阳性菌17株(占39.53%,以金黄色葡萄球菌为主)和真菌5株(占11.63%);术后48 h时,感染组患者PCT、hs-CRP、IL-6、IL-2水平值显著高于未感染组(P<0.05);上述指标采用ROC曲线预测切口感染的AUC分别为0.836、0.788、0.925和0.780,特异度分别为79.31%、58.62%、89.66%和65.52%。结论:引起胃肠疾病患者术后切口感染的病原菌呈现多样化分布,且通过早期炎症因子水平的预测可有效判别其切口感染的发生概率,术后感染风险不容小觑,临床应高度重视。 Objective: To analyze the characteristics of pathogen distribution of postoperative incision infection in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery and the influence of serum PCT, hypersensitive C-reactive protein(hsCRP), interleukin-6(IL-6) and interleukin-2(IL-2) levels on infection. Methods: Clinical data of 284 patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to December 2019 were selected and divided into infected group(n=29) and uninfected group(n=255) based on the infection status of surgical incision. The characteristics of pathogenic bacteria in the tissue fluid of incision at 48 h after operation were analyzed and compared, and the prediction efficacy of the changes in the levels of PCT, hs-CRP, IL-6 and IL-2 on postoperative incision infection were compared. Results: 43 strains of pathogenic bacteria were isolated from 284 gastrointestinal surgery patients, among whom 21 strains of Gram-negative bacteria(mainly Pseudomonas aeruginosa) accounted for 48.84%, 17 strains of Gram-positive bacteria(mainly Staphylococcus aureus) accounted for 39.53%, and 5 strains of fungi accounted for11.63%. At 48 h after operation, the levels of PCT, hs-CRP, IL-6 and IL-2 in infected group were significantly higher than those in uninfected group(P< 0.05). The AUC of the above indexes used ROC curve to predict incision infection were 0.836, 0.788, 0.925 and 0.780, respectively, and the specificity was 79.31%, 58.62%, 89.66% and 65.52%, respectively. Conclusion: Pathogenic bacteria causing postoperative incision infection in patients with gastrointestinal diseases present diversified distribution, and the prediction of the level of early inflammatory factors can effectively distinguish the incidence probability of incision infection, so the risk of postoperative infection should not be underestimated,and special attention should be paid to it.
作者 李金凤 宋真真 刘冰 LI Jin-feng;SONG Zhen-zhen;LIU Bing(The Third Affiliated Hospital of He'nan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou 450000,China;The Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450000,China)
出处 《抗感染药学》 2021年第8期1212-1215,共4页 Anti-infection Pharmacy
基金 河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(编号:KJCX8396)。
关键词 胃肠手术 切口感染 病原菌特征 炎症因子 预测效能 gastrointestinal surgery incision infection pathogenic bacteria characteristics inflammatory factors predictive efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献153

  • 1池畔,林惠铭,徐宗斌.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌根治术围手术期并发症发生率比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(3):221-224. 被引量:85
  • 2李福莲,张克伟,菅福琴,梅逸静,师建成,王世浩.大肠癌患者医院感染危险因素流行病学调查分析[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2006,13(17):1293-1294. 被引量:7
  • 3Allegranzi B, Bagheri Nejad S, Combescure C, et al. Burden of endemic heahhcare-associated infection in developing coun- tries: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J ]. Lancet, 2011, 377(9761) : 228-241.
  • 4World Health Organization. Report on the endemic burden of heahhcare-associated infection worldwide [ R ]. Switzerland : Ge- neva, 2011.
  • 5Bagheri Nejad S, Allegranzi B, Syed SB, et al. Heahh-care-as- sociated infection in Africa: a systematic review [J]. Bull World Health Organ, 2011,89 (10) : 757-765.
  • 6Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guideline for pre- vention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Con- trol and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee [J]. Am J Infect Control, 1999, 27(2): 96-134.
  • 7National Institute for Health and Care Excellenee. Surgical site infections : prevention and treatment [ EB/OL]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2008 [2015-10-12]. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg74.
  • 8Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berríos-Torres SI, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 up- date [J ]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2014,35(6): 605-627.
  • 9Byrne DJ, Napier A, Cuschieri A. Prevention of postoperative wound infection in clean and potentially contaminated surgery. A prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clin- ical trial[J]. Surg Res Commun, 1992,12:43-52.
  • 10Earnshaw JJ, Berridge DC, Slack RC, et al. Do preoperative chlorhexidine baths reduce the risk of infection after vascular re- construction? [J]. J Vascular Surg, 1989,3(4):323-326.

共引文献153

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部