期刊文献+

相对头盆不称因素剖宫产后再次妊娠阴道分娩的临床特征分析 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨相对头盆不称(RCPD)因素剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道分娩(VBAC)的临床特征。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月1日至2018年12月30日于广州市妇女儿童医疗中心住院的剖宫产术后单胎妊娠经阴道成功分娩的765例产妇的临床资料,依前次剖宫产指征分为RCPD组(133例)和非RCPD组(632例),并对两组产妇的各项临床特征进行比较。结果:RCPD组与非RCPD组身高(157.84±4.69 cm vs 159.43±4.95 cm)、分娩孕周(38.1±2.44 w vs 38.70±1.76 w)、第二产程时长(42.14±34.87 min vs 34.00±29.46 min)、钳产助产比例(24.81%vs 14.24%),分娩前后Hb下降均值(17.50±11.78 g vs 15.57±11.81 g)比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);RCPD组中90例获得前次剖宫产分娩新生儿体质量数据(3311.67±412.26 g)高于本次VBAC新生儿出生体质量(3025.00±560.17 g),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:RCPD因素剖宫产术后再次妊娠并非阴道试产绝对禁忌证,合理控制新生儿体质量、适宜的分娩时机、安全有效运用助产技术可促进这部分人群阴道分娩,降低剖宫产率。
出处 《实用妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第10期796-798,共3页 Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献40

  • 1Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth AfterPrevious Caesarean Birth. Green-top Guideline No.45[EB/OL]. (2015-10-01) [2016-05-10]. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg45/.
  • 2National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.Caesarean section. NICE clinical guideline 132[M].Manchester: NICE, 2011.
  • 3Sentilhes L, Vayssi^re C, Beucher G, et al. Delivery forwomen with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinicalpractice from the French College of Gynecologists andObstetricians (CNGOF)[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Heprod Biol,2013,170(1):25-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015.
  • 4Guise JM, Hashima J, Osterweil P. Evidence-based vaginalbirth after Caesarean section[J]. Best Pract Res Clin ObstetGynaecol, 2005,19(1):117-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015.
  • 5American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOGPractice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previouscesarean delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 116(2 Pt 1):450-456. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251.
  • 6Clark SM, Carver AH, Hankins GD. Vaginal birth aftercesarean and trial of labor after cesarean: what should we berecommending relative to maternal risk:benefit?[J]. WomensHealth (Lond), 2012,8(4):371-383. DOI: 10.2217/whe.l2.28.
  • 7Whitelaw N, Bhattacharya S, McLernon D, et al. Internetinformation on birth options after caesarean compared to theRCOG patient information leaflet; a web survey [J]. BMCPregnancy Childbirth, 2014,14:361. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-361.
  • 8Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Risk of uterine rupture associated withan interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months[J]. ObstetGynecol,2010,115(5):1003-1006. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.ObOBe-3181d992fb.
  • 9Dekker GA, Chan A,Luke CG, et al. Risk of uterine rupturein Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one priorcaesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohortstudy[J]. BJOG, 2010,117(11):1358-1365. DOI: 10.1111/j.l471-0528.2010.02688.x.
  • 10Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, et al. The MFMUCesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial oflabor after previous cesarean deli very [J]. Am J ObstetetGynecol, 2005, 193(3 pt 2):1016-1023. '.

共引文献355

同被引文献30

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部