期刊文献+

利奥西呱治疗肺高血压有效性、安全性及经济性的快速卫生技术评估 被引量:3

Rapid health technology assessment of the efficacy,safety and economy of riociguat in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:快速评价利奥西呱治疗肺高血压(PH)的有效性、安全性和经济性,为临床治疗方案的选择提供循证参考。方法:计算机检索主要中英文数据库及各大卫生技术评估网站。研究人员独立筛选文献、提取资料。进行质量评价后,对提取的结果进行分类评价和描述性汇总分析。结果:共纳入文献12篇,其中HTA报告2篇、系统评价/Meta分析7篇、药物经济学研究4篇。有效性分析显示:对于肺动脉高压(PAH)患者,相比于安慰剂,利奥西呱可显著增加6分钟步行距离(6-MWD)、心脏指数(CI),降低Borg呼吸困难指数(BDI)、平均肺动脉压(mPAP)、肺动脉阻力(PVR)、临床恶化率、血清氨基末端B型脑利钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)、肺高血压评分(LPH评分),差异有统计学意义。对于慢性血栓栓塞性肺高血压(CTEPH)患者,相比于安慰剂,利奥西呱可显著延长6-MWD,降低mPAP、PVR、BDI、NT-proBNP,差异有统计学意义。对于左心疾病相关性肺高血压(PH-LHD)患者,相比于安慰剂,利奥西呱仅对PVR、CI有显著影响。安全性分析显示:与安慰剂相比,利奥西呱的严重不良事件无显著增加。经济性分析显示:国外研究表明利奥西呱具有较高的增量成本效用比。结论:利奥西呱对PAH、CTEPH患者具有良好的有效性和安全性,对PH-LHD的有效性尚需进一步研究。亟需开展其国内药物经济学研究。 OBJECTIVE To rapidly evaluate the effectiveness,safety and economics of riociguat in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension(PH)and provide evidence-based reference for selecting clinical treatment options.METHODS Major Chinese and English databases and some health technology assessment websites were searched.The researchers independently screened and extracted the relevant data.After a quality evaluation of the included literature,the extracted results were analyzed by descriptive summary.RESULTS There were 12 references,including 2 health technology assessment(HTA)reports,7 systematic evaluation/Meta-analysis and 4 pharmacoeconomic studies.Effectiveness analysis indicated that,for pulmonary arterial hypertension(PAH)patients,as compared to placebo,riociguat markedly extended 6-minute walking distance(6-MWD),cardiac index(CI),reduced Borg dyspnea index(BDI),mean pulmonary artery pressure(mPAP),pulmonary vascular resistance(PVR),clinical deterioration rate,serum amino terminal B type brain natriuretic peptide precursor(NT-proBNP)and pulmonary hypertension score.The differences were statistically significant.In patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension(CTEPH),6-MWD,PAP,PVR,BDI and NT-proBNP were markedly prolonged as compared with placebo.Patients with left heart disease-associated pulmonary hypertension(PH-LHD)had only significant effects on PVR/CI as compared to placebo.Security analysis revealed no significant increase in severe adverse events(SAEs)as compared with placebo.And economic analysis of foreign studies indicated that riociguat had a higher incremental cost-utility ratio.CONCLUSION Riociguat has excellent efficacy and safety for PAH/CTEPH patients.However,its effectiveness for PH-LHD requires further studies.And domestic pharmacoeconomic researches are urgently needed.
作者 柯义君 王威 门鹏 金涌 居靖 KE Yi-jun;WANG Wei;MEN Peng;JIN Yong;JU Jing(Affiliated Anqing Hospital,Anhui Medical University,Anhui Anqing 246000,China;College of Pharmacy,Anhui Medical University,Anhui Hefei 23000,China;Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing 100000,China)
出处 《中国医院药学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2021年第20期2105-2112,共8页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
基金 安徽高校自然科学研究项目(编号:KJ2020ZD21)。
关键词 肺高血压 利奥西呱 有效性 安全性 经济性 快速卫生技术评估 pulmonary hypertension riociguat effectiveness safety economy rapid health technology assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1Tricco A C,Antony J,Zarin W,et al.A scoping review of rapid review methods[J].BMC Med,2015,13(1):224.
  • 2Polisena J,Garritty C,Kamel C,et al.Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making:a descriptive analysis of processes and methods[J].Syst Rev,2015(4):26.
  • 3Ganann R,Ciliska D,Thomas H.Expediting systematic reviews:methods and implications of rapid reviews[J].Implement Sci,2010(5):56.
  • 4Khangura S,Konnyu K,Cushman R,et al.Evidence summaries:the evolution of a rapid review approach[J].Syst Rev,2012(1):10.
  • 5Harker J,Kleijnen J.What is a rapid review?A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments[J].Int J Evid Based Healthc,2012,10(4):397-410.
  • 6Featherstone R M,Dryden D M,Foisy M,et al.Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews:an analysis of results,conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews[J].Syst Rev,2015(4):50.
  • 7Hailey D.Toward transparency in health technology assessment:a checklist for HTA reports[J].Int J Technol Assess Health Care,2003,19(1):1-7.
  • 8Brouwers M,Kho M E,Browman G P,et al.AGREE II:Advancing guideline development,reporting and evaluation in healthcare[J].J Clin Epidemol,2010,63(12):1308-1311.
  • 9Higgins J P T,Green S.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0[updated March 2011][J/OL].(2011-03-10)[2015-07-21].http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 10Shea B J,Grimshaw J M,Wells G A,et al.Development of AMSTAR:A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews[J].BMC Med Res Methodol,2007,7(10):1-10.e7-8.

共引文献114

同被引文献84

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部