期刊文献+

急性冠脉综合征经PCI治疗后维持性服用替格瑞洛对患者血小板功能、心率变异性及安全性的影响 被引量:3

Effects of maintenance administration of ticagrelor on platelet function,heart rate variability and safety in patients with acute coronary syndrome after PCI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者采用经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)后维持性服用替格瑞洛对血小板功能、心率变异性及安全性的影响。方法回顾性分析我院接收的96例ACS患者的资料,按治疗方案将其分为对照组和观察组,各48例。两组均择期行PCI术,对照组术后给予氯吡格雷治疗,观察组术后给予替格瑞洛治疗。比较两组的治疗效果。结果治疗后,观察组的血小板功能(MPAR、PRU、CD62p)、心率变异性(SDNN、SDANN、LF、HF)均优于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的MACE、出血事件总发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论ACS患者在PCI术后维持性应用替格瑞洛可改善血小板功能和心率变异性,减少MACE和出血事件。 Objective To observe the effects of maintenance administration of ticagrelor on platelet function,heart rate variability and safety in patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS)after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods The data of 96 patients with ACS enrolled in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively.The patients were divided into control group and observation group according to the treatment plan,with 48 cases in each group.Elective PCI was performed in both groups.The control group was treated with clopidogrel,and the observation group was treated with ticagrelor after PCI.The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared.Results After treatment,the platelet function(MPAR、PRU、CD62p)and heart rate variability(SDNN,SDANN,LF,HF)in the observation group were better than those in the control group(P<0.05).The total incidence of MACE and bleeding events in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Maintenance application of ticagrelor in patients with ACS after PCI can improve platelet function and heart rate variability,reduce MACE and bleeding events.
作者 李金玉 孙鹏雀 LI Jinyu;SUN Pengque(Cardiovascular Medicine Department,Xi'an Daxing Hospital,Xi'an 710016,China)
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2021年第32期81-83,共3页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 急性冠脉综合征 经皮冠状动脉介入术 替格瑞洛 血小板功能 心率变异性 acute coronary syndrome percutaneous coronary intervention ticagrelor platelet function heart rate variability
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献136

  • 1杨新春,张大鹏,王乐丰,徐立,葛永贵,王红石,李惟铭,倪祝华,夏昆,连勇,薛永利,马利祥.冠状动脉内应用国产替罗非班对急性ST段抬高心肌梗死急诊介入治疗后心肌灌注和临床预后的影响[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(6):517-522. 被引量:73
  • 2Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC guide- lines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)[J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3): 267-315.
  • 3Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain: the value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department[J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243.
  • 4Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental dia- gnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209.
  • 5Hulten E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta- analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2013,61(8):880-892.
  • 6Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Muhicenter evaluation of a 0-hour / 1-hour algorithm in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-01502.
  • 7Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16): 1211-1218.
  • 8Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20): 2569-2619.
  • 9Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should pa- tients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score[J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425.
  • 10Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Lear P, et al. Comparing the predictive validity of three contemporary bleeding risk scores in acute coronary syndrome [J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2012, 1 (3): 222- 231.

共引文献1911

同被引文献51

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部