期刊文献+

网络主权原则的法理宣示与实践运用——再论网络间谍活动的国际法规制 被引量:6

The Jurisprudence and Practical Application of the Principle of Cyber Sovereignty:Further Thoughts on International Legal Regulation of Cyber Espionage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 网络间谍国际法规制已成为当前网络空间建章立制中的一个焦点问题,围绕这一问题的大国博弈不断升温。美国出于维护自身网络霸权的目的,持续在国际法层面推动网络政治间谍和网络经济间谍的“两分法”,主张前者不违反国际法,而后者应受国际法禁止。与此同时,美国所主导的多起网络监控和窃密事件的曝光,进一步凸显了上述主张的双重标准和霸权主义色彩。美国极力予以区分的两类网络间谍行为,在现有国际法上都没有明确规定,但也都构成对他国主权和安全的危害,应当在国际法上加以禁止。中国应当基于网络主权原则的法理宣示与实践运用,着力推动对网络间谍的同等约束,在维护网络空间良法善治的同时,最大限度地维护本国正当利益。 In the current process of establishing rules and regulations for cyberspace,international legal regulation of cyber espionage has become a focal issue,and the great power game around it has been heating up.The United States,out of the desire to maintain its hegemony in the cyber domain,continues to advocate the Dichotomy between cyber political espionage and cyber economic espionage in international law,arguing that the former does not violate international law while the latter should be prohibited.Meanwhile,the exposure that the United States repeatedly conducted cyber surveillance and economic espionage further highlights the double standards and hegemonism nature of the aforementioned claims.The two types of cyber espionage that the United States strives to distinguish are not explicitly provided for in the existing international rules,but they both make harm to the sovereignty and security of other countries and should be prohibited in international law.In the face of the above challenges,China should pay special attention to the jurisprudence and practical application of the principle of cyber sovereignty,in an effort to ensure that the two types of cyber espionage activities be equally prohibited,so as to maximize its legitimate interests while safeguarding sound law and good governance in cyberspace.
作者 黄志雄 孙芸芸 HUANG Zhi-xiong;SUN Yun-yun
出处 《云南社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第6期69-80,92,186,187,共15页 Social Sciences in Yunnan
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“网络空间国际规则博弈的中国主张与话语权研究”(项目号:20&ZD204)的阶段性成果。
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献84

  • 1饶戈平,蔡文海.国际组织暗含权力问题初探[J].中国法学,1993(4):96-105. 被引量:28
  • 2饶戈平,黄瑶.论全球化进程与国际组织的互动关系[J].法学评论,2002,20(2):3-13. 被引量:34
  • 3王宏德.美国间谍,从“特工门”说起[J].世界知识,2006(3):60-63. 被引量:1
  • 4Dissenting Opinion by Mr. Alvarez, Admission of a State to the United Nations ( Charter, Art. 4), Advisory Opinion: ICJ Reports 1948, p. 68.
  • 5Oscar Schachter, " Human Dignity as a Normative Concept", 77 American Journal of International Law 848, 853 ( 1983 ).
  • 6Anthea Elizabeth Roberts, "Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation", 95 American Journal of International Law 757 (2001).
  • 7Frederic L. Kirgis, "Custom on a Sliding Scale", 81 American Journal of International Law 146 (1987).
  • 8李鸣.《当代国际法的发展:人权定向对主权定向》,2009年中国国际法年会主题发言.
  • 9《<日内瓦公约>第一附加议定书》第1条第2款,载白桂梅、李红云主编.《国际法参考资料》,北京大学出版社2002年版,第346页.
  • 10Jost Delbrtick, "Globalization of Law, Politics, and Markets - Implications for Domestic Law - A European Perspec- tive", 1 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 9, 10 - 11 ( 1993 - 1994).

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部