2015—2019年哲学学科CSSCI论文CASHL文献保障率实证研究——以8所高校引文数据为例

Empirical Study on CASHL Literature Guarantee Rate of CSSCI Papers on Philosophy Discipline from 2015 to 2019:Taking Citation Data of Eight Universities as an Example

[目的/意义]旨在为学科建设及CASHL资源建设提供参考。[方法/过程]利用文献计量法和引文分析法,以8所高校哲学学科2015—2019年CSSCI收录论文及其外文引文为数据源,匹配CASHL资源,从引文文献类型、语种及年代分布等维度,对CASHL资源保障情况进行统计分析。[结果/结论]CASHL资源体系中哲学学科资源存在语种及类型分布、平台服务等方面的问题。提出扩展文献覆盖类型,进行学科专业化建设;加大小语种保障力度,搭建多语种共享平台;优化平台服务质量,提升平台易用性等对策建议。

[Purpose/significance]This paper intends to provide references for discipline construction and CASHL resource construction.[Method/process]Using bibliometric method and citation analysis method this paper takes CSSCI papers and foreign citations of philosophy disciplines in eight universities from 2015 to 2019 as data sources matches CASHL resource and makes statistical analysis of CASHL resource guarantee from the dimensions of citation literature type language and age distribution.[Result/conclusion]There are some problems in language and type distribution and platform service of philosophy discipline resources in CASHL resource system.This paper proposes countermeasures and suggestions such as expanding literature coverage types and carrying out discipline specialization construction increasing small languages protection and building multilingual sharing platform and optimizing platform service quality and improving platform usability.