企业参与现代学徒制的成本收益分析及启示被引量：1

Cost-benefit Analysis and Enlightenment of Enterprise Participation in Modern Apprenticeship

下载PDF

导出

摘要作为最基本的社会经济组织,企业参与现代学徒制的意愿和行动必然受到成本收益因素的绝对影响。如何解决企业参与现代学徒制过程中对成本收益问题的担忧,无疑是实现现代学徒制双主体目标的主要瓶颈和最大障碍。通过分析企业参与现代学徒制的成本收益构成及各项目的影响程度,并据此提出与我国国情相应的解决策略,以期为我国现代学徒制在企业层面的推进提供参考。 As the most basic socio-economic organization,the willingness and actions of enterprises to participate in modern apprenticeship are bound to be absolutely affected by cost-benefit factors.How to solve the concerns about the cost and benefit of enterprises in the process of participating in the modern apprenticeship is undoubtedly the main bottleneck and the biggest obstacle to the realization of the dual-subject goal of the modern apprenticeship.By analyzing the cost-benefit structure of enterprises participating in the modern apprenticeship system and the degree of influence of various projects,this paper proposes corresponding solutions to my country's national conditions,in order to provide a reference for the promotion of modern apprenticeship in my country at the enterprise level.

作者赵瑞婷 ZHAO Rui-ting(Department of Finance,Shanxi Management Vocational College,Linfen 041050,China)

机构地区山西管理职业学院财会系

出处《湖北工业职业技术学院学报》 2021年第5期6-9,共4页 Journal of Hubei Industrial Polytechnic

基金山西省2019年度教育科学“十三五”规划课题“我国中西部高职院校现代学徒制运行机制研究”(GH-19290)阶段性成果。

关键词校企合作现代学徒制成本收益 School enterprise cooperation Modern apprenticeships Cost benefit

分类号 G710 [文化科学—职业技术教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献2

1李秀峰.制度变迁动因的研究框架——探索一种基于新制度主义理论的整合模型[J].北京行政学院学报,2014(4):8-14. 被引量：11
2郑玉清.国外现代学徒制成本分担机制探析——兼论现代学徒制企业的成本与收益[J].中国职业技术教育,2016,32(15):63-68. 被引量：26

二级参考文献41

1MAHONEY,JAMES & KATHLEEN THELEN. Theo- ry of Gradual Institutional Change [C]// JAMES MA- HONEY ,KATHLEEN THELEN. Explaining Institu- tional Change. Ambiguity, Agency, and Power.New York.Cambridge University Press, 2010 . 4.
2THELEN,KATHLEEN.How Institutions Evolve. In- sights from Comparative-Historical Analysis[C]//JAMES MAHONEY , DIETRICH RUESCHEMEYER.Com- parative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences.New York. Cambridge University Press. 2003.218.
3IKENBERRY,GJOHN..Conclusion. An Institutional Approach to American Foreign Economic Policy [J]. international or ganization, 1988,42(1).
4KRASNER,D.STEPHEN. Sovereignty. An Institutional Perspective[J]. Comparative Political Studies,1988,21(1).
5MAHONEYJAMESE RICHARD SNYDER Rethingk- ing Agency and Structure in the Study of Regime Changes [J].Studies in Comparative International Devel- opment, 1999,34(2).
6STEINMO, SVEN. Historical Insti- tutionalism.in DonateUa delia porta and Michael Keating [C]//Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sci- ence. A Pluralist Perspective.New York. Cambridge U- niversity Press, 2008.18-138.
7HALL, PETER A. & ROSEMARY C. R. TAYLOR.. Political Science and the Three New InstitutionalismsLl]. Political Studies, 1996,44(4).936-957.
8DIMAGGIO, Paul J. & Walter W. Poweli. Introduc- tion. [C]//WALTER W. POWELL, PAUL J. DIMAG- GIO.The New Institutionalism in organizational Analy- sis. Chicago. University of Chicago Press,1991.1-38.
9MOE,TERRY M.Political Institutions. The Neglected Side of the Stow[J]. Journal of Law, Economics, and Or-ganization,1990(6) .213-253.
10HALL,PETER A. Historical Institutionalism in Ratio- nalist and Sociological Perspective [C]//JAMES MA- HONEY ,KATHLEEN THELEN.Explaining Institu- tional Change. Ambiguity, Agency, and Power.New York. Oxford University Press, 2010.204-223.