适性教学摭论被引量：1

On Adaptive Teaching

下载PDF

导出

摘要教学的起点是学生,教学的目的是促进学生的发展。适性教学是基于学生的能力和需求而展开的、促进学生多元发展的教学。适性教学有着悠久的思想渊源,它蕴含于古典教育传统中,反映了人类对教育的美好憧憬。教学应立足学生本位,尊重个体差异,激发内在潜能,旨在实现学生的适性发展。为更好地实施和推进适性教学,需要开展弹性化的教学设计,采取多元化的教学策略,满足差异化的学习需求,开展真实性的教学评价。 Students are the starting points of teaching,and the purpose of teaching is promoting students'development.Adaptive teaching is an approach aimed at promoting diversified development of students on the basis of their abilities and needs.Adaptive teaching has a long ideological history,is embedded in the classical education tradition,and reflects the beautiful vision of human beings for education.Teaching should take students as its starting point,respect individual differences,stimulate internal potential,and aim to achieve the adaptive development of students.To better implement and promote adaptive teaching,it is necessary to develop flexible teaching design,adopt diversified teaching strategies,meet differentiated learning needs,and carry out authentic teaching evaluation.

作者吉标王冉 JI Biao;WANG Ran(Faculty of Education,Shandong Normal University,Jinan,Shandong,250100,PRC;School of Education Science,South China Normal University,Guangzhou,Guangdong,510655,PRC)

机构地区山东师范大学教育学部华南师范大学教育科学学院

出处《当代教育与文化》 2021年第6期54-60,共7页 Contemporary Education and Culture

关键词适性适性教学因材施教多元智能 adaptivity adaptive teaching individualized teaching multiple intelligences

分类号 G420 [文化科学—课程与教学论]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1曾文婕,黄甫全.学本评估:缘起、观点与应用[J].课程．教材．教法,2015,35(6):33-41. 被引量：49

二级参考文献19

1Boud D, Falchikov N. Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education [M]. London & New York: Routledge, 2007: Preface.
2Scriven M. The Methodology of Evaluation [M] // Tyler R W, et al. Perspectives in Evaluation. Chica- go, IL: Rand MeNally, 1967: 89-83.
3Allal L, Lopez L M. Formative Assessment of Learn- ing [M] //OECD. Formative Assessment: Impro- ving Learning in Secondary Classroom. France:OECD Publishing, 2005: 241.
4Earl L M. Asassment as Learning: Using Classroom As- sessment to Maximize Student Learning [M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2003: 21, 25.
5Baehr M. Distinctions between Assessment and Eval- uation [M] //Beyerlein S W, et al. Faculty Guide- book.. A Comprehensive Tool for Improving Faculty Performance (4^th ed.).Lisle, IL: Pacific Crest, 2007 : 441-444.
6Wiliam D, Black P. Meanings and Consequences: A Basis for Distinguishing Formative and Summative Functions of Assessment [J]. British Educational Research Journal, 1996, 22 (5):537-548.
7Stiggins R. From Formative Assessment to Assess- ment for Learning: A Path to Success in Standards- Based Schools[J]. Phi Delta Kappan, 2005, 87 (4) : 324-328.
8ARG. Testing, Motivation and Learning [Z]. Cam- bridge.. University of Cambridge Faculty of Educa- tion, 2002: 2-7.
9Harlen W. Teachers' Summative Practices and As- sessment for I.earning-tensions and Synergies [J]. The Curriculum Journal, 2005, 16 (2) : 207-223.
10Costa A L. Reassessing Assessment [J]. Educational Leadership, 1989, 46 (7): 2.