期刊文献+

基于认知性访谈的中文版患者报告结局测量信息系统焦虑和抑郁量表的研制 被引量:16

Development of anxiety and depression Scale in Chinese version of Patient Report Outcome Measurement Information System based on cognitive interview
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的检验翻译后的患者报告结局测量信息系统——焦虑、抑郁简表与源量表概念和语义是否等价并进行适当的文化调适。方法采用目的抽样,纳入上海市某三级甲等医院住院的肿瘤患者以及健康人群,通过质性研究方法中的认知性访谈技术,采用半结构式标准化问题探针开展3轮、共计20人的认知性访谈,了解受访者的作答过程,运用内容分析法进行资料分析,并根据访谈结果对中文版量表进行文化调适。结果第1轮访谈结果显示:受访者能够理解大多数条目,焦虑量表中有4个条目因“语法结构不完善、书面化语言”需要进行修饰;抑郁量表中有2个条目因“否定式”问题及直译所致的“污名化”而需要进行修改。第2轮访谈结果显示:受访者对焦虑量表汉化及修订后条目的语言理解与原问卷表达均一致,但对于抑郁量表的2个条目在经过第3轮认知性访谈修订后最终也达成一致。结论经认知性访谈、修改后,中文版患者报告结局测量信息系统——焦虑、抑郁简表与原版概念、语义等价,可用于下一步大样本测量学检验。 Objective To promote the conceptual and linguistic invariance of Chinese and English version of the anxiety and depression short forms of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system(PROMIS).Methods By purposive sampling,20 participants from a first-class hospital of Shanghai tumor patients and healthy population were recruited.Three rounds of cognitive interview were conducted.Content analysis was used to analyze data and cultural adaption was made based on interview results.Results The results of the first round of interviews showed that respondents could understand most of the items.Four items in the anxiety scale needed to be modified due to"imperfect grammatical structure and written language",and two items in the depression scale needed to be modified due to"negative"questions and"stigmatization"caused by literal translation.The results of the second round of interviews showed that interviewees'language understanding of the Chinese and revised items of the anxiety scale was consistent with the expression of the original questionnaire,but the two items of the depression scale were also agreed after the third round of cognitive interview.Conclusion Revised-Chinese version of the PROMIS-anxiety and depression short form is of invariance of concept and semantics with the original version,which is ready for measurement property test of large sample size.
作者 杨瑒 黄跃师 吴傅蕾 黄青梅 张晓菊 蔡婷婷 朱瑞 臧娴 袁长蓉 Yang Yang;Huang Yueshi;Wu Fulei;Huang Qingmei;Zhang Xiaoju;Cai Tingting;Zhu Rui;Zang Xian;Yuan Changrong(Nursing Department of Fudan University Affiliated Cancer HospitalDepartment of Oncology,Shanghai Medical College,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032;Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Fudan University,Shanghai 200032)
出处 《护士进修杂志》 2021年第22期2069-2072,共4页 Journal of Nurses Training
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目资助(编号:71874032) 复旦大学护理学院复星基金资助(编号:FNF201813)。
关键词 认知性访谈 患者报告结局测量信息系统 焦虑量表 抑郁量表 Cognitive interview patient-reported outcomes measurement information system Anxiety Depression
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1JOHNSON C, SCOTF B. Eyewitness Testimony and Suspect Identfication as a Function of Arousal, Sex of Witness, and Scheduling of Interrogation [ C ]. Paper presented at meetings of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 1976.
  • 2GARBARINO J, SCOTT F M. What Children Can Tell Us[ M]. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1989.
  • 3HENDERSON E. Psychological Research and Lawyer's Perception of Child Witnesses in Sexual Trials. In Carson & Bull (Eds.). Handbook of Psychology in Legal Context[M]. Second edition, 2003: 494.
  • 4WELLS G L. Verbal Descriptions of Faces From Memory: Are They Diagnostic of Identification Accuracy ? [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985, 70:619-626.
  • 5GEISELMAN R E, SCHROPPEL T , et al. Objectivity Bias in Eyewitness Performance[ J ]. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2000, 14 : 323 - 332.
  • 6VAN KOPPEN P J, LOCHUN S K. Portraying Perpetrators:The Validity of Offender Descriptions by Witnesses [J]. Law and Human Behavior, 1997, 21 : 661 -685.
  • 7WELLS G L, BRADFIELD A L. “Good, You Identified the Suspect” : Feedback to Eyewitness Distorts Their Reports of the Witnessing Experience [ J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83:360-376.
  • 8JOHNSON M K, RAYE C L. Reality Monitoring[J]. Psychological Review, 1981, 88:67 -85.
  • 9ALONSO -QUECUTY M L. Recuerdo de la Realidad Percibida vs. Imaginada: Buscando la Mentira[J].Boletfn de Psicologfa, 1990a, 29:73 -86.
  • 10HERNaNDEZ- FERNAUD E, ALONSO- QUECUTY M L. The Cognitive Interview and Lie Detection: A New Magnifying Glass for Sherlock Holmes? [ J]. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1997, 11:55 -68.

共引文献8

同被引文献120

引证文献16

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部