期刊文献+

基于汉字搜索的情景线索效应研究 被引量:1

Semantic Information Takes Precedence over Spatial Location and Glyph Feature in Contextual Cueing with Chinese Characters
下载PDF
导出
摘要 个体通过学习目标−场景联结关系提高搜索速度的现象即为情景线索效应。本研究以高频(包含丰富语义线索)或低频(语义线索少)汉字为实验材料考察语义、字形特征、空间位置线索的作用。结果显示个体可以学习字集−位置重复场景产生情景线索效应,且该效应在改变高频字集的空间线索而非字集线索或改变低频字集线索而非空间线索时可迁移,表明在情景线索学习中,语义线索占据优先地位,其次是空间线索,最后是字形特征线索。 During visual search,humans are able to improve their search performance through learning constant associations among the targets and the scenes in which the targets are typically presented in,that is,contextual cueing effect.This study used high-frequency(contains rich semantic cues)or low-frequency(contains less semantic cues)characters as the visual search item to investigate the role of Chinese characters’features including,semantic meaning,orthography,and spatial location in contextual learning.In the initial learning session,participants viewed either repeated search displays with both the characters and their locations maintained constant or novel displays with both characters and location varied randomly.In a subsequent test session,either characters or spatial locations were randomly varied to examine whether a change on the semantics or the spatial locations would affect the transfer of the learned contextual cueing effect(if any).The results showed significant contextual learning effects in both experiments.Most importantly,the high-frequency characters that consisted of both semantic and orthographic qualities maintained contextual cueing effects that could be transferred when the spatial location of the characters changed but not when the characters semantics or orthography were changed.In contrast,low-frequency characters that mainly contain orthographic qualities(semantic being too complicated),had a contextual cueing effect that could be transferred when characters changed form(spatial location maintained)but not when spatial location changed(character maintained).The results suggest that the spatial locations are more important than the orthographic context when semantics are less important,but semantic context is the most important when semantics,orthography and spatial location are all presented at the same time.In other words,in Chinese character based contextual learning,semantics plays a dominant role,followed by spatial context and finally orthographic context.
作者 朱欢 谢肖蔚 戴喆如 唐小雅 臧健 吴娇 臧学莲 ZHU Huan;XIE Xiaowei;DAI Zheru;TANG Xiaoya;ZANG Jian;WU Jiao;ZANG Xuelian(Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders,Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 310015;Jing Hengyi School of Education Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 311121;Dingyuan No.2 Middle School,Chuzhou 233203;Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Research in Assessment of Cognitive Impairments,Hangzhou 310015)
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第5期577-584,共8页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(32071042) 杭州师范大学科研启动经费(RWSK20190315) 留学回国人员(团队)在杭创业创新项目(4045C5062000616) 杭州市医学重点学科建设项目。
关键词 视觉搜索 情景线索效应 汉字语义线索 空间位置线索 字形特征线索 visual search contextual cueing effect Chinese characters’semantic cues spatial location cues glyph feature cues
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献42

  • 1葛列众,王松琴,何灿群.背景线索效应的研究综述[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1451-1452. 被引量:6
  • 2Besner, D. , Smith, M. C. , & Macleod, C. M. (1990). Visual word recognition: A dissociation of lexical and semantic processing. Jour- nal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 16, 862 - 869.
  • 3Catena, A. , Fuentes, L J. , & Tudela, P. (2002). Priming and inter- ference effects can be dissociated in the Stroop task: New evidence in favour of the automaticity of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulle- tin & Review, 9, 113 - 118.
  • 4Dagenbach, D. , Carr, T. H. , & Wilhelmsen, A. L (1989). Task - induced strategies and near- threshold priming: Conscious influ- ences on unconscious perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 412 - 443.
  • 5Dombrowski, J. H. , & Heil, M. ( 2006 ). Semantic activation, letter search and N400 : a reply to Marl - Beffa, Vald6s, Cullen, Catena andHoughton (2005). Brain Research, 1073 - 1074, 440 - 443.
  • 6Henik, A. , Friedrich, F. J. , Tzelgov, J. , & Trainer, S. (1994). Ca- pacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming. Memory & Cognition, 22, 157 - 168.
  • 7Houghton, G. , Tipper, S. P. , Weaver, B. , & Shore, D. I. (1996). Inhibition and interference in selective attention : Some test of a neu- ral network model. Visual Cognition, 3, 119-164.
  • 8Kuper, K. , & Heil, M. (2010). Letter search and relatedness propor- tion: Further electrophysiolgical evidence for the automaticity of se- mantic activation. Neuroscience, 20, 26 - 30.
  • 9Mari- Beffa, P., Uentes, L., Catena, J. &. Houghton,G. (2000). Semantic priming in the prime task effect : Evidence of automatic se- mantic processing of distractors. Memory & Cognition, 28, 635 - 647.
  • 10MacLeod, C. M. ( 1991 ). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect--an integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163 - 203.

共引文献6

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部