摘要
克里普克通过模态论证表明名称是严格指示词,一般摹状词是非严格指示词,从而对经典描述理论予以重击。一些坚定的描述论者认为通过对模态语境中的摹状词做宽域解读可以得到严格性。克里普克对宽域摹状词理论做出了批评,而索萨与陈波坚决地回击了克里普克。索萨与陈波的辩护工作存在可商榷之处,而宽域摹状词理论本身也已经偏离了经典描述理论。
Kripke demonstrates that names are rigid designators and descriptions(not contain-ing the descriptions which describe essential properties of objects)are not rigid desig-nators by modal argument,which strikes the classical descriptivist theory of names se-riously.Some firm descriptivists think that wide-scope interpretation of descriptions in modal context can represent rigidity.Kripke criticizes the theory of wide-scope descrip-tions,Sosa and Chen response Kripke resolutely.There are a few points worth discussing in the defensive work of Sosa and Chen,and the theory of wide-scope descriptions has deviated from the classical descriptivist theory of names.
作者
陈吉胜
张静
Jisheng Chen;Jing Zhang(School of Marxism,Central China Normal University)
出处
《逻辑学研究》
CSSCI
2021年第5期70-85,共16页
Studies in Logic
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“广义逻辑悖论的历史发展、理论前沿与跨学科应用研究”(18ZDA031)
南京大学“双一流”建设文科中长期研究专项“形式知识论研究”。
