期刊文献+

家属决策冲突量表在神经内科ICU患者家属中应用的信效度检验 被引量:6

Reliability and Validity of Decisional Conflict Scale in Family of Neurology ICU Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:编制家属决策冲突量表,并在神经内科ICU患者家属中对其进行信效度检验。方法:基于患者决策冲突量表(DCS),编制家属决策冲突量表,抽取神经内科ICU 191例患者家属进行问卷调查,检验其信效度。结果:家属决策冲突量表共16个条目,因子分析共提取3个公因子,累计贡献率达到68.024%。量表水平的内容效度为0.990,Cronbach’sα系数为0.885,各维度Cronbach’sα系数分别为0.802、0.861、0.924,Guttman折半系数为0.727。结论:家属决策冲突量表具有良好的信效度,适用于评估神经内科ICU患者家属的决策冲突水平。 Objective:To develop the family Decisional Conflict Scale(DCS)and test its reliability and validity in the family of neurology ICU inpatients.Methods:The family Decisional Conflict Scale was developed based on the patient Decisional Conflict Scale.Total 191 family members of neurology ICU inpatients were enrolled to test the reliability and validity.Results:The family-DCS consisted of 16 items.Factor analysis extracted 3 common factors,and the cumulative contribution rate reached 68.024%.The content validity index was 0.990.The Cronbach’sαcoefficients of the total scale was 0.885,and that of the 3 factors were 0.802,0.861,and 0.924,respectively.The Guttman split-half reliability was 0.727.Conclusion:The family DCS has good reliability and validity,which can be useful for assessing decisional conflict level in the family of neurology ICU inpatients.
作者 廖宗峰 李玲 黄姝 陈黛琪 李瑾 高申菊 王露 LIAO Zong-feng;LI Ling;HUANG Shu;CHEN Dai-qi;LI Jin;GAO Shen-ju;WANG Lu(Department of Nursing,Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030,China)
出处 《神经损伤与功能重建》 2021年第11期636-639,共4页 Neural Injury and Functional Reconstruction
基金 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院科研基金项目(2017C010)。
关键词 决策冲突 神经内科ICU 患者家属 信度 效度 decision conflict neurology ICU patients’family reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献65

  • 1王春枝,斯琴.德尔菲法中的数据统计处理方法及其应用研究[J].内蒙古财经学院学报(综合版),2011,9(4):92-96. 被引量:490
  • 2马如梦,郭树忠,苗丹民,张银玲,刘丹,李潼,徐烈,马进.美容咨询者与受术者个性差异分析[J].中国美容医学,2005,14(6):760-761. 被引量:22
  • 3蒋艳 ,沈宁 ,邹树芳 .护理研究中量表研制及测量学特征的评定方法[J].中华护理教育,2005,2(4):174-176. 被引量:80
  • 4Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 5Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 6Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 7Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 8Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 9Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 10Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.

共引文献1595

同被引文献46

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部