经合组织全球胜任力框架及测评的争议——兼论对中国国际理解教育的反思

The Controversy of OECD Global Competence Framework and Assessment——Reflection on International Understanding Education of China

自OECD将全球胜任力纳入PISA测试以来,很多国家愈发重视全球胜任力的研究和教育,但全球胜任力框架及测评也引发了争议。在借鉴"最佳实践"或"先进经验"之前,有必要首先澄清这些争议和质疑。因此,在简要介绍OECD全球胜任力框架和测评提出的原因和内容之后,从四个主要方面分析其争议:"全球胜任力"本身存在概念混淆的问题,并带有鲜明的经济导向、精英主义和西方中心的属性。中国需谨慎对待OECD全球胜任力的直接引入,建构适应本国的国际理解教育体系,并关注教育公平问题。

Since OECD has incorporated global competence into PISA 2018,many countries have paid more and more attention to the research and education of global competence.However,OECD Global Competence Framework and global assessment has also faced controversy.This paper argues that it is necessary to clarify and understand the controversies and doubts of OECD Global Competence Framework and assessment before borrowing the"best practice"and"advanced experience".Therefore,after a brief introduction of the reasons and contents of the OECD Global Competence Framework and competence assessment,this paper mainly analyzes the controversy from four main aspects.This paper finds that the concept of"Global Competence"itself lacks a clear definition and is characterized by its distinctive economic orientation,elitism and western centrism.This paper concludes that China needs to be cautious about the direct introduction of OECD Global Competence,building an education system for international understanding that is suitable for Chinese context and paying attention to the issue of educational equity as well.