融合Altmetrics指标的话语引导力特征分析与评价——以中国英文学术期刊为例

Analysis and Evaluation of Discourse Leading Characteristics by Integrating Altmetrics Indicators——A Case Study of Chinese Academic Journals in English

【目的/意义】开放科学时代,融合Altmetrics指标进行中国英文学术期刊话语引导力特征分析与评价,有助于丰富和完善中国特色学术期刊评价理论与指标体系。【方法/过程】首先从宏观层面对评价指标进行了描述性统计分析和分布规律的探究;从中观层面对不同学科评价指标分布特征进行了揭示;从微观层面对不同国际合作情况下评价指标的分布特征进行了解析。其次,根据评价指标特征及内涵,构建了评价指标体系。最后,采用相关分析、集成因子分析与熵权法和TOPSIS法优势,融合Altmetrics指标对中国英文学术期刊话语引导力进行了评价分析,并验证了评价结果的可靠性。【结果/结论】得到融合Altmetrics指标的话语引导力6个方面的特征。集成多种方法优势,融合Altmetrics指标评价处于多元化学术生态系统中的学术期刊话语引导力是可行且必要的,评价结果是可信的。【创新/局限】后续研究中,将扩大数据源,从更多维度来分析和评价学术期刊话语引导力,尝试提出中国学术期刊话语权的建构路径。

【Purpose/significance】Under the background of open science,this paper combines Altmetrics data to analyze and evaluate the indicator characteristics of discourse leading for Chinese academic journals in English,which is of great significance to enrich and improve the evaluation theory and indicator system of academic journals with Chinese characteristics,promote the construction of discourse system with Chinese characteristics.【Method/process】In this paper,descriptive statistical analysis and distribution rule of evaluation indicators are firstly carried out from the macro level.The distribution characteristics of evaluation indicators of different disciplines are revealed from the middle level.The distribution characteristics of evaluation indicators under different international cooperation conditions are analyzed from the micro level.Secondly,according to the characteristics and connotation of the evaluation indicators,the evaluation indicator system is constructed.Thirdly,correlation analysis,factor analysis,entropy weight method and TOPSIS method are adopted to evaluate and analyze the discourse leading of Chinese academic journals in English by integrating Altmetrics.At the same time,this paper verifies the reliability of the evaluation results,aiming at providing references for the establishment of world-class academic journals and the improvement of the discourse leading of Chinese academic journals.Six features of discourse leading integrated with Altmetrics were obtained.【Result/conclusion】It is feasible and necessary to integrate the advantages of various methods and integrate Altmetrics to evaluate the discourse leading of academic journals which are in a diversified academic ecosystem.Meanwhile,the evaluation results are reliable to a certain extent.【Innovation/limitation】In the follow-up research,we will expand the data sources,analyze and evaluate the discourse leading of academic journals from more dimensions,and try to put forward its construction path.