期刊文献+

全程硬膜外分娩镇痛在瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道试产中的应用 被引量:2

Application of Whole Course Labor Analgesia in Vaginal Delivery of Second Pregnancy with Scar Uterus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价全程硬膜外分娩镇痛在剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道试产中的应用效果,为提高阴道试产成功率提供参考依据。方法选择2019年2月1日-2020年12月1日某院收治的102例瘢痕子宫再次妊娠拟行阴道分娩者,采用随机数字表法将产妇分为2组,全程镇痛组(51例)和活跃期镇痛组(51例)。比较两组宫口开全时间、产程时间、缩宫素应用率、疼痛程度、应激反应指标和妊娠结局的差异。结果全程镇痛组宫口开全时间、各产程时间、缩宫素应用率均低于活跃期镇痛组(P<0.05),T_(3),T_(4)时VAS评分均低于活跃期镇痛组(P<0.05),T_(3)、T_(4)、分娩后(M_(1))Cor、E、NE水平均低于活跃期镇痛组(P<0.05),剖宫产率低于活跃期镇痛组(P<0.05)。2组并发症发生率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论全程硬膜外分娩镇痛可降低阴道试产中产妇应激反应,减轻疼痛程度,缩短产程,提高阴道试产成功率,较活跃期镇痛更适合瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩镇痛。 Objectives To evaluate the application effect of whole epidural analgesia in vaginal trial labor of second pregnancy after cesarean section,and to provide reference for improving the success rate of vaginal trial labor.Methods From February 1st,2019 to December 1st,2020 in a hospital,102 cases of re-pregnancy with scar uterus were selected and divided into two groups by random number table method:full analgesia group(51 cases)and active analgesia group(51 cases).The total time of uterine opening,labor time,oxytocin application rate,pain degree,stress response index and pregnancy outcome were compared between the two groups.Results The total time of uterine opening,the time of labor and the application rate of oxytocin in the whole analgesia group were lower than those in the active analgesia group(P<0.05),the SCORES of T3 and T4VAS were lower than those in the active analgesia group(P<0.05),the levels of Cor,E and NE in T3,T4 and after delivery(M1)were lower than those in the active analgesia group(P<0.05).The rate of cesarean section was lower than that of active analgesia group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions The whole course labor analgesia could reduce the stress response,reduce the intensity of labor pain,shorten the labor process,improve the success rate of vaginal trial labor,and is more suitable for vaginal delivery analgesia of second pregnancy with scar uterus.
作者 向波 俞瑾 陈虎 Xiang Bo;Yu Jin;Chen Hu(Department of Anesthesiology,Chongqing Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Chongqing 401120,China;不详)
出处 《中国病案》 2021年第11期94-97,共4页 Chinese Medical Record
基金 重庆市妇幼保健院院级科研项目(2019YJMS02)。
关键词 分娩镇痛 瘢痕子宫 阴道分娩 潜伏期 活跃期 Labor analgesia Scar uterus Vaginal delivery Incubation period Active period
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献151

  • 1滕平,李欣荣,王增梅,禹志霞,陶华娟,张绪东.分娩镇痛新进展[J].中国实用医药,2007,2(33):189-190. 被引量:6
  • 2汤蓓蕾,张引法,姚康珍,徐群,周雅华,常向阳,胡小霞.低浓度罗哌卡因混合芬太尼硬膜外自控分娩镇痛的可行性[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(1):82-83. 被引量:16
  • 3汪萍,苏悦,周学勤.妊娠期妇女对分娩方式选择的调查分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(5):80-81. 被引量:9
  • 4Friedman EA.Primigravid labor:a graphicostatistical analysis [J].Obstet Gynecol,1955,6:567-589.
  • 5Zhang J,Landy H J,Branch DW,et al.Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes[J].Obstet Gynecol,2010,116:1281-1287.
  • 6Spong CY,Berghella V,Wenstrom KD,et al.Preventing the first cesarean delivery:summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development,Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine,and American College of Obstetricians andGynecologists Workshop [J].Obstet Gynecol,2012,120:1181-1193.
  • 7Walker R, Turnbu11 D, Wilkinson C. Strategies to address global cesarean section rates: a review of the evidence[J]. Birth, 2002,29:28-39.
  • 8Betrdn AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates[l]. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 2007,21:98-113.
  • 9C6ceres IA, Arcaya M, Declercq E, et al. Hospital differences in cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts (US)2004-2006: the case against case-mix artifact [J]. PLoS One, 2013,8:e57817.
  • 10Blumenthal NJ, Harris RS, O'Connor MC,et al. Changing caesarean section rates. Experience at a Sydney obstetric teaching hospital [J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 1984, 24: 246-251.

共引文献1421

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部